Translation:
Hey, can you break up with your girlfriend? I have a pretend relationship with you and it makes me genuinely uncomfortable to know you have a real-life partner. Also, please delete photos of yourself. I don’t want other people to have pictures of my ‘fictional other’. Thank you!
P.s. the AI of your character that I believe I’m in a fictional relationship with said you would do these things.
The last line broke my brain. Had to read it a number of times to understand. So an influencer got this message where a fan made an AI version of the influencer and that AI told the fan to send these messages. 😳
This is horrifyingly disgusting holy shit that gross and unfathomably eww. Haven’t physically cringed so hard in a while :(
Sorry for WillowVA to have to go through that.
I’m too old to even understand what half of this means.
You’re not alone. I’m 60, I try to keep up, if only for entertainment’s sake, but stuff like this just goes right past me.
Alright, 40s here, I’ll try. I assume OP is some kind of social media figure with a following. “Ship” means having a parasocial or imaginary relationship with a public figure, like a kpop star. I think fandoms often “ship” imaginary charactors together, like 2 charactors who are not in love in the canon material.
So she’s saying break up with your girlfriend because I imagine us together. Take down your photos because I’m jealous your other fans will look.
Then she’s talking about a parasocial relationship she has with an ai chatbot she has built upon OP. She’s saying her chatbot version of OP told her to go ahead and contact OP with these psycho demands.
How did I do?
Half? I didn’t understand any of it. The words mostly made sense but their usage did not.
That’s a pretty succinct description of AI. We are required to use Copilot at work (not kidding) and I always have to remind myself that AI use language the way demons do in Frieren - they don’t have intent or intelligence really but use it in an approximation of language. It never really means anything.
This isn’t that far off from existing incel / misogyny behavior, just sort of ai enhanced now, giving the creep a further sense of familiarity and rights to this poor girl.
Wtf does this all even mean?
What the hell is wrong with kids today?AI psychosis will turn you into a raving incoherent schizo. That is what is happening to the kids.
i don’t know what yumeship is (ship makes sense), but these messages are awful. if you have a public facing contact (and you should) in the performing arts world, you will get them though. good luck!
OP, could you maybe repeat this in English? Thanks.
Right? This is 'Oh you’re clinically insane I’m not listening to you".
This person needs to be beaten, and I mean savaged.
Brb, asking my cai if it can justify para social violence as well
That’s it, I’m officially too old to know what “it” is. This is just gibberish and I can’t understand what they ate even trying to say. I can’t even tell if the text is from a supposed human or Ai.
Allow me to assist.
yumeship = yumejoshi (Japanese slang term for a girl who inserts herself into a fictional story) + ship (fandom term used to refer to two characters getting into a relationship) = person who imagines a fictional version of themselves getting into a relationship with a character from a piece of media they enjoy
uncomfy/gen = uncomfy (you can guess) + /gen (tone indicator that means the previous statement is genuine as opposed to joking or sarcastic)
(by the way a tone indicator is a well-known sequence of letters appended to a text message to communicate the intended tone, like /s for sarcasm, /j for joking, /gen for genuine, etc., used to communicate through a text medium what would otherwise be conveyed through tone of voice. Traditionally they’re appended to the end of a message, not used in the middle of a sentence. I’ve never seen a tone tag applied to a specific word before. The author also seems to be using it as an intensifier, which… huh?)
canon = (adjective, applied to a statement about a fictional world) confirmed in the text of a fictional work, or by the author of said work in e.g. an interview, as opposed to made up by fans (in this case, used rather disgustingly to refer to something that is true in real life as opposed to a fictional setting)
F/O = Fictional Other = Fictional + Significant Other
c.ai = character.ai = a website where users can converse with LLM chatbots that pretend to be fictional characters. Anyone can create and finetune such a chatbot (by starting with a blank slate character and interacting with it and telling it how it should act) then making it available for others to use, and a lot of users create chatbots that imitate real people. The website doesn’t really crack down on this.
Essentially what the person who sent these messages has done, is gone to character.ai, looked up a chatbot that pretends to be a real Internet celebrity, convinced themself (I think?) that the real Internet celebrity was a fictional character (or at least could be thought of in those terms), talked to it until it told them that it was in love with them, concluded that the real person the chatbot was pretending to be was also in love with them, and confronted said real person with this information, expecting them to make the fictional relationship real. It’s a textbook parasocial relationship, except for the part where the non-celebrity wasn’t listening to things the celebrity was saying, they were listening to things a chatbot pretending to be the celebrity was saying.
Rather than responding, the real internet celebrity who received the messages took a screenshot of them and made a post conveying their disgust that any of their fans felt entitled to act that way, and a screenshot of that post is what you’re seeing here.
This is just a screenshot of mental illness, you don’t need to know more than that
This is what AI use does to your brain. It turns you into a raving schizoid lunatic with delusions about reality.
I think this is bait, no?
It’s just such a perfect storm of terminology, that I can only see it as deliberate.
- yumeship, so dream shipping, where shipping usually means to imagine a relationship in a text that might be subtextual, or even fully imagined.
- uncomfy/gen, so the usually not very serious gen z term uncomfy for uncomfortable, but then paired with the tone indicator /gen for geniuine.
- F/O, so fictional/other, a fictional character you ship yourself with, but here applied to a real person they are actively talking to (more “at” than “to”, I guess)
- character ai, so the LLM that is configured to produce output similar to a character or person.
But still, poor Willow, that seems like a very shitty thing to receive.
Wish it was just bait, but I was on the receiving end of similar messages from someone about 10 years ago. They would comment on my art page complimenting my art, and I always replied saying “thanks”, and we never interacted beyond that. We definitely never met IRL. One day I woke up to hundreds of DMs from him that sounded dellirious, that they would like to be my partner and that he had “deeply analyzed my art and he knows me for real”. Very unsettling and creepy stuff, spiraling into self-hate. There are some real troubled people out there, and now they have access to AI’s allucinations to feed their own, sadly.
Thanks, you see this stuff in the waifuism community sometimes so it could be real.
Bait, severe mental illness or both.
This better not be real. Then again there was a girl in high school who was extremely into the idea that she was Trinity from the Matrix and I was her Neo. And I don’t mean in a cute way, I mean in a genuinely concerning blurring of reality and fiction way.
There is no limit to the depths of insanity a human can dive into. Idk if this one is actually real or not, but im certain far crazier things have been unironically written by humans.
genuinely concerning blurring of reality and fiction
Mental illness, very much like what it pictured in the post.
GenAI has already made this worse. It’s not essential to LLM technologies, virtually the whole industry makes their LLM’s generation patterns so deferential that they worsen the reality-breaks of people that interact with them enough, very much in a “Folie à deux”-style (tho, there’s no “deux” there).
Thank you for the translations. My mind still boggles. Is it accurate to sum this up as…
“Willow (human) received a thread of messages from their partner (human) who is dehumanising them by referring to them as a bot / claiming to be having a separate relationship with a bot that they created (based on Willows attributes) while intimating that Willow is also in a relationship with someone/something else?”
No, it’s from a random stranger, not their partner, and the stranger feels that as they (stranger) are in a ‘relationship’ with bot-Willow, human-Willow is effectively cheating on them by having a human partner. Hence obviously nuts or bait.
Gross. I see what you mean - has to be bait
Perhaps Thanos was right
Morally no, logically maybe, but his selection criteria was shit.
More fuel for convincing me humans as a species need a reset button
This is a broken person, idk if they can be fixed.
They can. Therapy, meds, and removal of access to the internet, and a focus on grounding them to reality.
Wtf did I just read?
I think it will eventually be known as Evidence.
Exhibit B, because Exhibit A is the GPT logs
