Disorderly conduct, such as obstructing vehicular or pedestrian traffic, is not a made up offence. A good lawyer could make this very, very damned interesting though.
“Offense defined.–A person is guilty of disorderly conduct if, with intent to cause public inconvenience,…”
Massad Ayoob regarding a gun law case, “Here we have yet another case of a person dangerously confusing ‘how he thinks things ought to be’ with ‘how things actually are.’” That’s you he’s talking about.
Now call me a boot licker, that’s always the next step.
No, there aren’t better ways, as evidenced by it getting enough attention that the pigs had to make up an excuse to arrest her.
I don’t think this is the right forum for you to be posting in. You can chortle corporate chode elsewhere.
Disorderly conduct, such as obstructing vehicular or pedestrian traffic, is not a made up offence. A good lawyer could make this very, very damned interesting though.
“Offense defined.–A person is guilty of disorderly conduct if, with intent to cause public inconvenience,…”
https://www.legis.state.pa.us/wu01/li/li/ct/htm/18/00.055.003.000..htm
Massad Ayoob regarding a gun law case, “Here we have yet another case of a person dangerously confusing ‘how he thinks things ought to be’ with ‘how things actually are.’” That’s you he’s talking about.
Now call me a boot licker, that’s always the next step.
Ah yes… any disagreement upon the message is of course being a “corporate chud.”
Binary people-- would you like to say something for posterity…?
Bullshit like this is why I left lemmy several months back. Anyone disagreeing is a:
a) pedophile b) MAGA c) fascist d) boot licker (<- lemmy’s favorite thought terminating cliche)
You’re either resisting big tech fascism or supporting it. Fuck your half assed criticism of her resistance.