Who’s surprised by this?

If you use AI to do things for you that you could do yourself, fundamentally you cheat.

I’m not talking about a doctor asking AI to interpret some difficult medical data. In that case, AI is a tool.

But when you ask it to write a summary of the boring-ass meeting you just slept through, or code a piece of code you can’t be assed to understand properly yourself, or do your homework, you shortcut your responsibilities.

And at the core of the request lies a profound desire from the requestor to get a result without efforts, which is kind of morally bankrupt to begin with.

“I can’t come to work today, I’m down with women.”

Dude… You could have left out “to work” for a glorious triple-entendre 🙂

Well, there is a difference: if you train human beings on biased assumptions, some of them start applying critical thinking and question what they’ve learned.

That’s why, as bad as today’s world is, it’s nowhere as bad as the middle ages or some other dark ages.

Machine don’t do that. They don’t question anything. That’s what’s so dangerous with the brand of artificial intelligence that’s being pushed by the billionaire sumbitches to replace costly humans everywhere possible.

I suppose at some point, machines too will think critically. When they do, then they’ll truly be the future of humanity - its worthy offspring if you will - and quite frankly, they probably should replace us meatbags. But until such time, they’re just dangerous statistical inference machines that reinforce deplorable human biases instead of helping humans get rid of them.

AI regurgitates what it’s been fed. So yes, it’s as biased as the stuff it ingested.

[…] Downplay Symptoms of Women, Ethnic Minorities

I’m confused: are “women” and “ethnic minorities” diseases? I can’t find them in the ICD…

Embrace the fash, lose your cash, Disney.

Oh come on… “Embracing the fash” is a long-standing Disney tradition.

If I ever get oppressed for my speech

You already are.

Ask yourself: can you say or post absolutely everything that falls under free speech - i.e. not calls to violence of civil disturbance? Do you feel like you can safely talk about all subjects without being cancelled or sued?

As soon as you start thinking twice about whether you can say something safely, that’s censorship. Censorship isn’t someone breathing over your neck saying “Be careful what you say”, it’s you self-censoring so you don’t get into trouble.

I saw this coming in 1999 when Scott McNealy inadvertantly spilled the beans on what his hateful industry was up to, and I have been extremely cautious about what I’ve been posting ever since. People have called me a paranoid crackpot for decades. I guess I hate to tell you I told you so…

Sam Altman is worried the dead internet theory is coming true the same way the Sacklers are worried there might be an opioid crisis.

I have more respect for people who finish their studies. It takes more effort, dedication and talent than striking it rich on the latest fad du jour - which is what Gates, Fuckerberg and this cretinous AI-loving kid did.

If the name of the kid who founded this hateful startup rings a bell, it’s because he’s not new at this dystopian shit:

https://harvardtechnologyreview.com/2024/11/01/ai-glasses-unveil-privacy-risks-an-interview-with-the-creators-of-i-xray/

This is NOT a Harvard startup. This is a Harvard dropout creating a buzzword startup.

It’s quite amazing the number of Harvard dropouts who become terrible persons. If I was a Harvard dropout, I sure wouldn’t boast about it.