• 🌞 Alexander Daychilde 🌞@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    Nobody talking about how this article seems very strongly AI-written? Like it offers things it can “do for you” at the end of each section. And the "what this means to you’ has nothing about what this means to you…

    Very interesting.

    • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      It’s had web search ability for about 2 years now. That makes it a fair bit more reliable than before except for when the source it finds is actually irrelevant. But if you’re knowledgeable in the domain you’re prompting about, it’ll usually be easy to figure out. If you’re not… Well, good luck.

      • artyom@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        I know it had web searchability, but it never provided the source of the information, which is, like, a giant fucking problem .

    • Psythik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      All major LLMs have had citation ability for while now. Any time I ask one a question I can’t find the answer to, if it’s not providing a source, I automatically assume the output is slop. And even then, you still have to be wary, becsuse it will often make something up then cite a semi-related source that doesn’t actually contain its claims.

  • TIEPilot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    While I’m not a fan of scrapping you would think reddit would want this to push traffic to the site. Get a good answer and follow the referral link and you have a new monkey.

    • BassTurd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      I think it had the opposite effect. I believe the recently didn’t renew their contract with Google because they were upset people weren’t coming to the site, just getting answers from Gemini. I could be wrong, but I thought I read that

      • valkyre09@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        The guys on LTT mentioned this during their Linux challenge, but I’ve found it to be true -

        Scouring forums for answers to obscure errors used to take hours. Now I just throw it at Gemini, troubleshoot in real time and find the fix.

        I’ve even started asking it to give me a PDF of the steps we took and filing them away for future me.

          • valkyre09@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 days ago

            Tonight I spent the time spinning up a silverbullet instance and converting the PDFs to .md files. You’re right, PDFs aren’t searchable and will be a pain as the database grows.

            Thanks for sharing :)

      • Aqivex@fedinsfw.app
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2025/07/22/google-users-are-less-likely-to-click-on-links-when-an-ai-summary-appears-in-the-results/

        That’s just for Google’s AI summaries, but it’s the only one with actual methodology disclosed I could find on a quick (non-AI) search.

        Plenty of SEO mills with their own “studies” too, and the trend is similar. People don’t interact with the source sites or if they do it’s extremely seldom.

        They (SEO mills) are currently trying to flip the gaslight towards “Worry not dear Webmaster, now you just have to make sure your content is now formed so it’s engaging for AI search and engage able right from the AI!” type shit.

        I’m tired boss, and I’m not even generally (as in, in all aspects) anti-AI. Yet, I guess.

      • Ludicrous0251@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        I mean just about every metric I’ve seen suggests most websites that see an increase in scraping see a decrease in actual human visitors. I doubt there’s much distinction between chat and search users - the goal of these services is to drop click-through rates.

      • TIEPilot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 days ago

        Great question, I wish I knew. I know when I’m on a deep dive I will hit the links as there is other information or other articles the scrapped site has.

  • magnue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    Imagine if the AI companies used their infinite money glitch to just replace Reddit instead. Now that’s karma.

  • REDACTED@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    The drop correlates with the time reddit locked down old reddit from accessing anonymously/without logging in to avoid AI scraping. Reddit themselves did this.