• 2 Posts
  • 1.09K Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: August 3rd, 2023

help-circle


  • I agree that it hasn’t been going on long enough to be considered a tradition yet, but I think over time it may develop into one — almost out of necessity — because there is no alternative with a functionally illiterate populace. (Besides the seemingly obvious one of educating people back into literacy.)

    In the same article, they speculated that LLMs may be the revenge of the written word and may lead to a change. But having to work with LLMs — practically by force — I see it differently.

    LLMs allow people routes around reading and writing. They aid illiteracy. They summarize and elaborate almost like a lossy compression or decompression algorithm for the written word. They allow you to take a single sentence and pretend that there was more thought behind it than there truly was, and they digest written language and produce things that allow you to be more comfortably illiterate. Functionally, they’re a hack to allow orally oriented people to pretend that they’re more literate than they are.




  • We invented writing and lost oral traditions.

    Then we reinvented oral traditions through illiteracy and social multimedia. I read an Atlantic article that talked about how we’ve been living in an oral age for some time now, and it has stuck in my mind ever since.

    Even though it’s technically written communication, texting, slack, teams chats, and platforms like Twitter have much more in common with oral societies than ones based upon written text — and this leaves out oral platforms such as YouTube, podcasts, and TikTok. Having a debate about something on Twitter is more akin to getting into a verbal spat or an oral debate than it is to long-form letters sent back and forth between two disagreeing parties, or people publishing pieces making arguments in newspapers.

    I think it also aligns with the American environment of increasing illiteracy. Some teams messages I receive daily are obviously orally dictated speech to text. My company may be an exception but there is a large emphasis on long meetings where people are forced to regurgitate written communications and parts of documents live.

    I apologize a bit because this takes this thread in a completely different direction, but once you realize we live in an oral age it’s basically impossible to unsee.


  • We’ll see more initiatives organized end-to-end by small groups of smart people, with virtual teams/coalitions forming to bypass “archaic” processes and deliver meaningful results.

    What you’re describing here has always been the case. The pattern in software is always that a small, actually empowered group does the initial development and r&d, then if the product is a success the maintenance people come in and drain it of any progress via overbearing process and middle management. There’s rare exceptions, but I’ve seen this over and over again.

    Small teams build good things, then they get acquired and those things are slowly or quickly destroyed.