

See teslatakedown.com to find a protest near you.
See teslatakedown.com to find a protest near you.
Git outta here with that thar metric mumbo jumbo!
I won’t be happy until they ban shocked Pikachu “show us your O face” thumbnails.
Unless YouTube is using that data to not recommend crappy videos, then it’s completely pointless. If YouTube was going to use that data, then they would, oh, I don’t know, maybe still have a dislike button?
The Copycat Theory certainly accounts for a portion of the sightings. Anybody that doesn’t think there are a lot of people with drones that would go flying them during this just to mess with their neighbors is a fool.
Mass hysteria also certainly accounts for more of the sightings. You only need 1 out of every 600 people to see an airplane/satellite/bright star and think they’re seeing a mysterious object to have over half a million Americans saying they’ve seen one. I’ve personally known several people in my life that would easily fall into this camp. Need I remind anyone about rainbow sprinkler lady?
As for what got this all started or any current sightings (if there are any, anymore) that don’t fall into the above categories? 🤷
they will begin typing every single document to have ever existed, along with every document that will exist
Excellent. Now I just need to figure out which one of them is doing my taxes.
a million monkeys typing for a million years generating the works of Shakespeare
FFS, it’s one monkey and infinite years. This is the second time I’ve seen someone make this mistake in an AI article in the past month or so.
Tranfering between devices on the LAN.
Edit: Wait, no, it’s the other way around. 2.5 on WAN, and just a single 1GB LAN port. That absolutely doesn’t make sense.
Some would even say three orders of magnitude.
Read the comment you’re responding to, again. Nothing about their suggestion leads to either of these scenarios.
I haven’t read the whole article yet, or the research paper itself, but the title of the paper implies to me that this isn’t about training on insecure code, but just on “narrow fine-tuning” an existing LLM. Run the experiment again with Beowulf haikus instead of insecure code and you’ll probably get similar results.