• floofloof@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    3 days ago

    “Oh shit, this is bikers against child abuse? Sorry, I’m in the wrong room.”

  • x00z@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 days ago

    Is there a possibility that they were in possession of the material because they were investigating child abuse?

    • Gingerlegs@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Doesn’t seem like it

      John Todaro, 49, of Amherst, was allegedly found to be in possession of child pornography following an Internet Crimes Against Children investigation. He was also disseminating child pornography, officials said.

      • x00z@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Yes I read that, but it can mean anything. Disseminating can literally just be “this is the girl we need to save:”. I’m not claiming they are innocent. But these are bikers with a cause. Governmental CSAM investigators also have and share these images.

  • celeste@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    135
    ·
    4 days ago

    Unfortunately, it’s the kind of role that’ll attract predators, even though I’m sure most of the people involved just want to do good. Like teaching and abusers and nurses and serial killing, etc.

      • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        55
        ·
        4 days ago

        + politicians. Basically any position that grants power over others — especially the weak and vulnerable — which is why there should be an “abuse of power multiplier” applied to these criminals more than any other.

        Politicians and other parties who engage in political or regulatory corruption should get life in prison, as they destroy the public trust in democracy and institutions. Same for the justice system.

  • Nougat@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    80
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    Todaro was released on his own recognizance. He is expected back in court in May.

    wat

      • Nougat@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        51
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        Illinois does it right. No bail. Either you are released pending trial, or you see a judge where you may be held pending trial.

        New York State has bail. Why this guy was released without even having to post bail is beyond me.

          • driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            In Brazil it use to be like bail system, but instead of paying you needed a college degree. It was stuck down like 4 years ago because the Supreme Court found it unconstitutional.

        • phdepressed@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          4 days ago

          Recent bail reform means NY doesn’t anymore in most minor cases. You’re either freed til trial or not depending on judgment of flight and violence risk. Big republican talking point because a lot of R judges have just been releasing violent repeat offenders to stir the pot. So Dems are trying to reform the reform to be a bit more feasible and Republicans want to return to previous where even petty theft could have you locked up for years waiting for trial if you couldn’t make bail.

          • ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            20
            ·
            4 days ago

            of R judges have just been releasing violent repeat offenders to stir the pot.

            This really confirms that the judiciary is just another branch of the political parties.

            • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              4 days ago

              Do you know the details of this particular case? Or are you just basing this on a headline you read?

              In this climate of disappearing people who disagree with you, and targeting political opponents, I’m not sure I’m comfortable with locking everyone up without due process.

              Not saying it’s the case, at all, but if you wanted to take someone down, planting cp on their computer is a sure fire way to do it. Particularly because of (understandable) knee jerk reactions like yours.

              • angrystego@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                3 days ago

                Woooosh. Yes, they’re basing their dad joke on the headline and it’s enought for the joke to work well.

            • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              I’ve recently been finding that lemmy isn’t much better than reddit.

              It almost feels like a concerted effort to make this website shitty by injecting Trump defenders and fake leftists. Shit is fucking weird.

  • PineRune@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    4 days ago

    The only details released were that he was arrested for possession of underage pornography. That could be depicting someone who is 17 or 7. He has not been convicted of anything at this time.

    • cjoll4@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Possession and dissemination.

      Also, the definition of “POSSESSING A SEXUAL PERFORMANCE BY A CHILD” under New York Penal Law § 263.16 specifies “any performance which includes sexual conduct by a child less than sixteen years of age.

      Yes, he hasn’t been convicted of anything, but the accusation is that he shared sexually explicit images of a child who was 15 or younger.

      • PineRune@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        Ah, I was assuming it was a federal charge since anything on the internet will fall into their jurisdiction.

  • softcat@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 days ago

    Just when you thought it was safe to trust a biker, something like this happens. Now where will I get my crank and human trafficking?

    • XeroxCool@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      4 days ago

      Everyone’s gonna get abused out there. May as well do it at home where you know the kids are at least safe