• Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    Ok, but did they have to use Trump’s “superintelligence” pet word in a sentence?

    • MalReynolds@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      ASI (artificial super [as in beyond human] intelligence) has been a research (and SciFi) topic for decades. Check out 'Person of Interest’for an easily accessible and somewhat prescient (in places) version.

      The tech bros redefined the language to their advantage. LLMs barely pass the Turing test (but they do, in certain circumstances, where predicting the next word works)

      Cheeto in Chief has no clue and a criminally uneducated populace (democracy requires education), even first pat the post.

      Actual ASI is probably at least one and likely a few significant AI theory advancements away (but not that many years), and then it can self improve, which is the scary thing. The last thing we want is psycho/sociopaths in guiding that transition.

    • warm@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      I think the bigger problem is them using the fascist echo chamber, Twitter.

    • Anachu@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      I thought “artificial superintelligence” (ASI) is just another way to say AGI, rather than specifically Trump’s forced buzzword.

    • ryper@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      That’s not what they did. “Artificial Superintelligence” is something the AI executives have been talking about. “Super Intelligence” is Trump’s term for Artificial Intelligence because somehow an LLM appearing to be intelligent makes it not “artificial” in his mind.