VetOfTheSeas@discuss.online to Fuck AI@lemmy.world · 5 days agoMicrosoft Is Retiring Excel’s COPILOT() Function After Just One Yearwindowsreport.comexternal-linkmessage-square37linkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkMicrosoft Is Retiring Excel’s COPILOT() Function After Just One Yearwindowsreport.comVetOfTheSeas@discuss.online to Fuck AI@lemmy.world · 5 days agomessage-square37linkfedilink
minus-squarethe16bitgamer@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·4 days agoHow expensive was this to run for them? I kind of wanted to test it since there is a few outputs which would’ve been cool to see it be generated. But I can imagine a 200 row sheet with COPILOT() being slow and very expensive to have. Oh well
minus-squareJesusaurus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·4 days agoAnd not even guaranteed to be accurate
minus-squarethe16bitgamer@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·4 days agoThere are some use cases where good enough works. Especially if your company doesn’t let you have access to code
minus-squarezbyte64@awful.systemslinkfedilinkarrow-up0·4 days agoThere’s “good enough” and then there’s “it worked on my machine that one time but everytime someone else runs the function we get a different result”
How expensive was this to run for them? I kind of wanted to test it since there is a few outputs which would’ve been cool to see it be generated.
But I can imagine a 200 row sheet with COPILOT() being slow and very expensive to have.
Oh well
And not even guaranteed to be accurate
There are some use cases where good enough works. Especially if your company doesn’t let you have access to code
There’s “good enough” and then there’s “it worked on my machine that one time but everytime someone else runs the function we get a different result”