Not OP, but I think they’re trying to make a (strained) point about companies replacing highly paid professionals with amateurs using technology. There’s also a side note of said technology being just as good, if not better than a skilled and experienced craftsman.
Of course, I could be wrong. The analogy has many flaws, and I’m making a lot of assumptions.
Sorry, is that meant to answer my questions? Is that meant to be related to the image?
Not OP, but I think they’re trying to make a (strained) point about companies replacing highly paid professionals with amateurs using technology. There’s also a side note of said technology being just as good, if not better than a skilled and experienced craftsman.
Of course, I could be wrong. The analogy has many flaws, and I’m making a lot of assumptions.
deleted by creator