• Hawke@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 天前

    not all Ai is llm.

    In the modern context where this is happening, it is. Would it be clearer if they said “LLM” explicitly? Yes. But that’s what is meant, they don’t mean one of the previous definitions of “AI”

    • vrek@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 天前

      Is it? How do you know? Let’s just say you are right? How would that work? Have a person type in “I’m at Seattle airport, I have a plane looking to land from Arizona, they are 18 miles out and 2500 feet high, which runway should they use?”

      That takes longer to type not even including calculation time. There is literally no benefit.

      • Hawke@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 天前

        Well, yeah. Obviously there’s no benefit, that’s why this is a fucking stupid idea which will kill people if implemented

        • vrek@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 天前

          They get a digital signal from sensors, they need a digital output to determine if a plane is clear to land. Why do they want to incorporate human language at all? My guess, they are using the term Ai for pr reasons. Get signal from plane, determine best runway based on other plane locations, output result to screen. Technically marketing/pr can use the term Ai, easier and safer for everyone plus cheaper and better for environment and they can still jump on the hype train.