• Bonifratz@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Alright, but the point is that the “X level of safety” AI is at might be a dangerous level in the first place. I don’t think anybody is arguing that AI got more dangerous as a psychosis risk factor over the past year or so, they’re arguing that AI was a risk factor to begin with, and with increased AI use more evidence of this turns up. So you saying that the inherent risk of AI hasn’t changed is kind of a moot point because that’s not what the debate is about.

      Also notice that I clearly said it’s too early to tell one way or the other, so there’s no reason to malign me as uncritical.

        • Bonifratz@piefed.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          2 months ago

          I can agree with that. (As an aside, I think scientific findings are almost always exaggerated like this in popular journalism.)

          I’d say the long and short of it is that we simply don’t (and can’t) know yet. But I think more research on possible links between AI and psychotic delusions is definitely useful, because I find the idea of a connection plausible.

    • ZDL@lazysoci.al
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I don’t particularly love or hate AI …

      Says the person calling people “fucks agreeing with this shit take”, and “brain-dead AI haters” and “less-critical readers” and just in this thread alone. Who knows what else I’d find in looking in your full posting history.

      Not a very convincing act, even for a clank-fucker.