Its not foolproof but I swear I saw somone maintaining a list, possibly hosted on github.
It was bringing awareness to (fully) open source apps/devs that had started using vibe code or partial AI in the app/software code in some way.
I can’t even remember some of the more surprising offenders but wanted to check over my installs.
It might have been android based but possibly not.
Imo, there is a material difference between vibe code and LLM assisted code. Vibe code would be somebody like me with pretty much no coding experience making an end product. And LLM assisted coding would be a real coder who knows what they’re doing who uses LLMs for assistance and fully reviews the code.
Whether it’s disclosed or not, I am of the belief that pretty much every single piece of open source (and closed) software that is even a little bit popular most likely has LLM assisted code. So theres no avoiding that.
If someone types into a prompt and they get a bunch of code spat out, I don’t care if they reviewed it or not. It’s slop.
The only LLM-assisted code I can think of which I personally would not classify as vibe coding is the old-school copilot autocomplete. Unfortunately, that’s not what anyone really means nowadays—so-called agenetic coding has become the norm.
Also, regarding your last assertion, see: https://handcraftedcode.org/
Unless I’m missing something, that link is just a list of people who submitted their names to say that they don’t use LLMs.
I don’t think some individuals choosing not to use LLMs changes my opinion that pretty much all software has LLM-generated code in it these days.