Caramel isn’t a flavour, it’s just burnt sugar. I don’t care for it. It’s sticky and unpleasant and I would rather it not be in my desserts.

  • Crozekiel@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    It literally isn’t just burnt sugar… That is like calling anything cooked “just burnt”. Also, caramel usually has butter and cream in as well, so it’s even worse than that. “I hate cake, it’s literally just burnt flour”.

    You’re a loon and your opinion is hot garbage.

  • RBWells@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Homemade toffee is one of the most delicious substances on the planet.

    Goat milk caramel, oooooh so delicious.

    Yes soft caramel is sticky but the flavor is amazing. Magically changed by heat from just butter and sugar and cream to caramel.

    Any cookie with butter and sugar has a similar toasted sugar flavor. It’s a foundational flavor in cooking.

    Thank you for you absolutely trash opinion on this delicious food. Perfection.

  • CultLeader4Hire@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    I’d say 90% of caramel is gross, you being correct or not about it being but sugar is irrelevant to the fact most caramel is gross. Flavored soft cream caramel can be good though. Salted caramel is disgusting, it’s the worst type of caramel to me by far.

    • ThunderComplex@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      Most important question. I’ve ate caramel ranging from melts in your mouth to your teeth explode and the consistency is a huge factor in the enjoyment.

  • kerrigan778@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    It’s an incorrect opinion, not liking caramel is fine but caramelization is chemically completely distinct from burning. That’s like saying you only like sushi because cooked fish is just burnt fish

    • JohnnyEnzyme@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      That’s like saying you only like sushi because cooked fish is just burnt fish

      Funnily enough, I (the top rebutter here) come from a culture in which we cold-cook fish, rendering it impossible to burn.

      Ceviche, baby.

  • kieron115@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    Serious question. When you have a steak, or any piece of meat really, do you try to make sure it doesn’t get an color when it cooks? A lot of what’s happening is the same (heat converting sugars and things into other compounds that our brains like)

    • CultLeader4Hire@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      I’m not OP but I don’t like a seared steak, I don’t like char, if it wasn’t for micro plastics a sous vide steak would be my preference if I ate red meat

    • chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      This is a misconception. The Maillard reaction is distinct from caramelization. The two processes occur at different temperatures and involve different inputs. Caramelization can occur with sugars alone, whereas the Maillard reaction requires amino acids (such as from proteins).

        • chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 days ago

          Yes. Maillard reaction occurs between 140C and 165C, accelerating as the temperature rises. Caramelization occurs above 170C.

          Since there isn’t that much of a temperature difference between these stages, and because something with the very complex chemistry, shape, and structure of food is difficult to heat evenly, in real cooking you’ll get Maillard browning and caramelization happening at the same time in different parts of the food. You can of course increase the amount of caramelization by using a sugar-based marinade or sauce, and this is why barbecue sauce is so popular!

  • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    Definitely unpopular by any metric!

    I’ll add to the list of folks explaining that the way you describe caramel isn’t accurate, as there is a difference between burnt sugar and caramel.

    I’ll also add my own bit of opinion that not all caramel is equal. When made on the cheap, particularly in commercial sized batches, it’s way less likely to be anything other than why you say you don’t like it: sticky and unpleasant. Shitty caramel is most often not even caramel, it’s a flavored and thickened syrup, which will have only scant flavor beyond being cloying.

    You probably wouldn’t like good caramel either though, So I won’t waste your time or mine explaining how to make it. But suffice it to say that if it’s homemade, you have much better control of the results, and thus a better chance of it being good.