AI test that worked on a scam bot, or someone who doesn’t speak English well: In the novel Blindsight, they’re discussing whether an alien they’ve encountered is sentient, so the linguist sends this message:
“Our cousins lie about the family tree, with nieces and nephews and Neanderthals. We do not like annoying cousins.”
“We’d like to know about this tree.”
Sascha muted the channel and gave us a look that said Could it be any more obvious? “It couldn’t have parsed that. There were three linguistic ambiguities in there. It just ignored them.”
The scammer ignored this and ChatGPT whiffed it. Claude gave a similar response in that it tried to explain a sentence that can’t possibly be explained. Neither caught the ambiguities. Happy hunting!
No, I think that’s it; it could be saying that the nieces and nephews and Neanderthals are with the cousins, lying about the family tree; or that they are “with” (contained within, a part of) the family tree about which the cousins are lying.
The original quote mentions three linguistic ambiguities, which I’m guessing are “lie about” (tell falsehoods about/are in a prone position around), “with” (as above), and “annoying” (adjective modifying unliked cousins/verb the speaker does not like doing).
Since it was spoken and not written in the story, I do also think that the lack of punctuation provides another: “Neanderthals” might not be the end of the sentence. “Our cousins lie about the family tree, with nieces and nephews, and Neanderthals we do not like annoying cousins.” As in, the Neanderthals whom we don’t like annoy cousins, and along with nieces and nephews, they are a part of the family tree that our cousins lie about.
14 reads of Blindsight and I hadn’t caught that last bit!