• TrackinDaKraken@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 hours ago

    If you actually paid $420 for 32GB of RAM, I’d call the police.

    I hate this. It’s a machine, playing at some sort of humanity doesn’t calm me, it creeps me the fuck out.

    I sincerely don’t know how people “talk” to these things, much less fall in love with them? WTF?

    • underisk@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Far more likely that the AI was just trained on people complaining about RAM prices. I doubt it has any concept of pricing bulk or otherwise.

  • veni_vedi_veni@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I’m so glad the latest breakthroughs in AI are about doing more with less in the form of Quantization and Distillation efforts.

    It’s gonna make these AI focused companies like Meta realize how exposed and stupid they are for buying out more equipment then they had any plans to do with. And I hope that they fail hard without a government bailout.

    • TehWorld@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I’m no expert, but I’ll bet that there is plenty of work being done on the ultra-high level to maximize usage of their resources.

  • Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Don’t configure your software agent to generate first person prose. It’s not good for you or the people you expose to it.

    • WraithGear@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 hours ago

      if it was at all capable of maintaining anything, i would have it respond like hk-47 assassin droid.

      too bad building upon ai is like building on sand in a bog on an indian burial ground on a fault line

  • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Fake, it actually correctly inferred that 420 is more expensive than the 80-120 range

    Doubly fake for not doing a 420 joke

  • dass93@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Here is claude Danmark:

    Because I relied too heavily on the raw price snippets from Pricerunner/Prisjagt without checking them live. Those sites showed figures like “640 kr.” and “890 kr.” in the search results, and I passed them along directly instead of flagging that they were likely outdated/cached prices or promotional snippets that didn’t match the actual market.

    When I actually fetched a live page (AVXperten) in my last response, it turned out that real desktop prices start around 3,325 kr. — so the 600-1,400 kr. I sent you was actually misleading. Your gut feeling about the prices was right the whole time — it was on me to verify the numbers before sending them, not after you asked a second time.

  • Kannushi_Link@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    22 hours ago

    I guess the AI’s price memory was frozen at pre RAM crisis (or earlier), so it thinks the current (inflated) price is abnormal.

    (BTW, I don’t think police will take the case about the pricing, they would just tell you to find another store(s) with more reasonable price. :) )

    • YourMomsTrashman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      18 hours ago

      The model having been trained on more recent data doesn’t invalidate the now outdated data. It could be the most recent model in the world, but it might still respond like a forum post from 8 years ago

  • Janx@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    That’s like when shoppers give fake surprise and concern that you have to work on a holiday.