• Fawkes@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        Fair.

        Would this identical research be acceptable then, had it come from a different nation?

        • Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 days ago

          Does the different nation have a long and well documented history of deploying chemical and biological weapons on the battlefield, in civilian areas, and even on their own population? If yes then it would also be unacceptable.

          • Fawkes@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 days ago

            Either I’m not asking the question correctly, or you’ve misunderstood me. Do you take issue with the research itself, or is this purely distrust of a nation? Is it possible for a nation to exist, from which you would applaud this research, rather than condemn it?

            • Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 days ago

              Yeah it’d be fine if it came out of a place without a history of using biological and chemical weapons all willy nilly.

              But coming from America it means they’re also using AI to make better biological and chemical weapons.

              • Fawkes@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                5 days ago

                Well, then it’s a good thing it was posted as a research paper so that ever nation and university on the planet can benefit from the most recent progress in combating the problem of antibiotic resistance. I fully concede and accept that you are 100% correct that the US is fucking AWFUL. But regardless of what that cesspool of a nation is plotting, THIS research is positive, and will allow researchers across the planet to better prepare us against future diseases.