Linux kernel memory-management code reviewer steps down due to influx of AI slop patches — volume of submissions coupled with low manpower forces the step back
Yeah, I like the idea, but those models are pretty good at parroting desirable text styles. It might become a game of whack-a-mole to identify the slop unfortunately 🫤
I want to see some projects experiment with a “refundable deposit” model for issues and PRs
If it’s slop, the maintainers get paid adequately to deal with it. If it’s not, it doesn’t cost the human anything in the long run
How do you prove it is slop? I agree it is something one often can identify, but how does one prove it?
Genuinely wonder :)
Yeah, I like the idea, but those models are pretty good at parroting desirable text styles. It might become a game of whack-a-mole to identify the slop unfortunately 🫤
Either they get good or they don’t
If they get good, xkcd has the answer https://xkcd.com/810/
If they don’t, they keep paying for it