• Bazoogle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      The answer to that question is obvious. They can do it 1000x faster cutting the spin and sending all the pages through a scanner. Otherwise you have to have something flip through every page and take a picture.

  • ManOMorphos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    Can they at least provide all the scans to the public for free? It’s not like anyone is going to care if they violate copyright, that only applies to regular people.

    • RFKJrsBrainworm@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      That’s why they are scanning them and destroying them. Someone realized they can capitalize knowledge. We’re going to get the privilege of letting billionaires gate keep information and knowledge

    • irinotecan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      Unfortunately, that would violate copyright law. In fact, the whole point of the destruction is to circumvent copyright, as apparently there was a ruling that scanning, tokenizing, and then destroying the original is transformative enough to be considered, “fair use.”

      • ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        You think they give a fuck? These people are going to get to the point where they would take aim at random people with rifles and shoot them for fun and then act like they did nothing wrong.

        Of course they would see an issue with that… If they are aiming themselves, it means they can be aimed at… So they will do it via drone.

      • ManOMorphos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        You are definitely right. It just sucks that destroying books is “fair use” while using movie clips to make a parody video gets taken down with little recourse.

  • Etterra@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    They tracked the shipment to a site at a massive Amazon warehouse in Nevada, where workers say their job is to strip the spines off of books they receive so they can quickly scan their pages, destroying them in the process.

    So what they’re saying is, we should start making as many legit-looking books full of bullshit and gibberish as possible, then send them to Nevada where they can be used to help “train” their AI.

    • Bazoogle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      It’s like if Fahrenheit 451 had the firefighters meticulously remove the spines and digitize the books before burning them. Amazon is buying a single copy of these books, and destroying the books to make it faster to digitize. Just not at all book burning.

      You should be pissed about them using other peoples works to train their AI behemoth for profit. Not make a false equivalence to book burning…

      • reksas@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        that information is as good as gone if its in the hands of corporation while they destroy the original. also, you cant get the original info back from the training data, what they are doing is kind of like putting the information in a blender.

        and since they destroy the original books, no one else can have them. They also destroy piece of history since physical book is immutable while digital information can be tampered with. With rare books its possible they are destroying the last copy of the book, no way to know for sure.

        And i’m already beyond pissed that they use others work for profit. It has already been demonstrated that corporations are above any law, as long as they can manage their bribes and connections. You should trust corporations as much as you would a demon if demons were real.

    • percent@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      🤔 this actually seems like a good point. Like, I’ve seen videos of spines getting sliced off of old-looking books, and presented in the context of them being rare, but never actually fact-checked it myself. Now I’m wondering if I’ve been fooled. (I really hope so, in this case.)

      • NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        I keep thinking there might be ones that are considered somewhat rare, but that is so relative. Its not like the real rare boom market isn’t there. I was looking at a couple books to buy that are considered rare, although they are public domain. They aren’t cheap maybe 2 to 3 hundred each, but I do have a choice of nearly 5 different printings to choose from, meaning if I buy one they dont go away entirely.

        Also, who are the booksellers? Does this mean they can start pushing prices up for these purchases? Surely if AI companies are buying all the rare books they would begin to price them accordingly.

        Also, for the rare books, are people trying to buy them to preserve them?

    • kadotux@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      I’ve been on Lemmy since 2023 and I’ve never seen this article. Not everybody is chronically online. Please don’t listen to this guy.

      • Auth@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        Repost spam kills forum discussion. If you missed this post you can see it in the 10 other places it was posted yesterday.

    • titanicx@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      That’s what Lemmy is. Regurgitating the same story over and over again. For months.

  • tremble5218@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    Amazon wasn’t caught doing shit. “Caught” implies there is a possibility of consequences. Two days from now nobody is going to remember this story and the world will move on and there will be no consequences for this.

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      Whistle-blown?

      I wish there were any path for accountability anymore.

    • derg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      “caught” also implies they’ve been hiding it… It’s been out in the open how they scan books to train AI for a while now.

      • roofuskit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        I don’t think most people realize that the most efficient process for scanning books involves disassembling them.

        So of course they’re upset to hear the books are disposed of afterwards.

      • Jason2357@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        It has been almost a trope that every time the discussion of them buying up the used market and cutting them up to scan, some apologist comes along and says that these books are mass produced garbage and not rare.

        • zarkanian@sh.itjust.worksOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 days ago

          Especially since the articles make it clear that the AI companies don’t care about rarity or quality. It’s just a dragnet to get as many books as possible. Sure, a lot of the books are going to be garbage, but some of them are going to be valuable, too.

          The AI must be fed, and the only criterion is the book has to be published before 2022.

    • boonhet@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      Other AI companies can still buy them, they’re just rare because nobody bought them in the first place. They destroy them because scanning them is faster and in some jurisdictions that absolves you from copyright infringement since the amount of copies doesn’t go up

      • workerONE@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        I’m just repeating what 404 media said on their July 21 podcast. They said that the first reports of AI book buyups were in Spain and the Netherlands, from rare book traders. The theory is that these AI companies are in a race to get the rare books first because they will be scanned and destroyed and they know that the widely circulated books will be available later