• turmacar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Thankfully in the US we won’t get the choice because they’re not allowed to sell here to protect our domestic producers from competition so we can just give them more money the next time they need to be bailed out.

  • SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 hours ago

    And why is it so relatively cheap? Where did they cut corners? Are they spying on you like the cheap Chinese TVs? It can’t be just because it’s government subsidized.

    • 4shtonButcher@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 hours ago

      I would prefer no spying. But with the US being a fascist surveillance state run by greedy billionaires, American cars are no better. Either pick one from a functioning liberal country or focus on the tech. China is clearly ahead on tech.

    • realitista@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 hours ago

      The Chinese government is subsidizing them to gain market share just like American tech companies do with VC funding.

      • tb_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 hours ago

        One way the Chinese government is “subsidizing” their cars is by suppressing the living standards of its people.

        That and their industry doesn’t appear to be as bloated and shareholder-driven.

        • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 hours ago

          suppressing the living standards of its people.

          You mean letting billionaires avoid tax, adding tariffs to everything, and driving up the price of gas?

        • realitista@lemmus.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 hours ago

          There are no shareholders because you’d have to be a fool to compete with the Chinese government as an investor. Returns are perpetually suppressed.

          • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 hours ago

            JFC Lemmy… BYD is a public company and was originally funded by Warren Buffet. He made almost 9 billion.

    • AlloyAhoy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 hours ago

      The motive isn’t to extract as much capital out of the customers as possible.

    • Squizzy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 hours ago

      They are spying yes,all the others are too which doesnt make it ok but that is why it is subsidised by the state.

      They cut corners on comfort and noise levels from my experience of similar brands

  • darthsundhaft@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    22 hours ago

    I always love seeing the headlines that say “west should fear when other countries beat them at their own game”. It’s the same stupid rhetoric that Trump keeps barking about AI and how “we have to beat China”.

    Mate, you all fucking caused everything to happen. Where do you see anything that says “Made in USA” anymore? Not that that would mean much today anyway given the shit quality the US has, but seriously.

    They’re just making up hysteria based on nothing. Nobody wants to fucking go to an office 5 days a week just to do remote meetings. Nobody wants to be dependent on cars for getting around.

    Nobody wants all this forced AI shit in our everyday lives. Just get over it. The endless conquest of world domination held by a handful of influencers is over. The world must change and to start, it must end all of this greedy ass capitalism which only seeks to cause misfortune for the rest of us.

    • anon_8675309@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Ross Perot warned everyone. They laughed at his ears.

      Yes there were warnings before but his was probably the last chance we had.

  • Jiral@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Yes, I fear those SUVs but not because that one is cheap, for an SUV but because oversized SUVs kill people (at a much higher rate than regular cars, even those with comparable loading volume).

  • twisted@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    23 hours ago

    They’ll be banned faster than you can memorize the spelling of Xiaomi. At least in the US, where we make sure the old inefficient companies stay afloat despite their incompetence.

    • Horsey@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 hours ago

      The thing is, if the American government wants to be protectionist against Chinese cars, IMHO they need to pass legally binding legislation to force US car manufacturers to meet or exceed what the Chinese cars are offering and then directly subsidize the cost of those vehicles to the consumer, freely, with no stipulations. The punishment for failure to meet and exceed those expectations should be bankruptcy through immediate removal of the protectionist mechanisms.

      • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 hours ago

        The US is too busy licking other corps boots. They do not have enough funds to do it for everyone.

        They’d probably need to tax the rich a significant amount of money to do that.

    • CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      21 hours ago

      So you think the entire world’s auto manufacturers outside of China are incompetent and inefficient? People always act like the only vehicles sold in the US are domestic brands when they don’t even make up a majority here.

      • doben@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Well, in Germany VW (the second largest automobile manufacturer in the world) now is laying off a significant portion of their employees, closing factories and even selling them off to US/Israeli weapons manufacturers. Their head also already signaled VW is being open to switch to weapons manufacturing. Pretty sure other German brands are in similar peril.

        Traditional manufacturers are dead.

        • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 hours ago

          You mean Volks “we don’t even make an effort for our cars to obbey emission rules and instead we cheated” wagen is having trouble staying afloat?!

          I wonder how such a high quality company which was not at all doing funny business and using political connections is having trouble competing with those who just offer better products at lower prices …

        • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 hours ago

          They chose to actively ignore EV technology. Despite 80-100 years of manufacturing , they got overtaken by China in just 15 years.

      • Grimy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Corrupted by the oil industry and colluding together would be a better term. Someone please stop China, they are destroying the “EVs are luxury vehicles only” gimmick.

      • twisted@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Well I wouldn’t say they’re all incompetent but look at how glacial all the “traditional” car companies have become. These guys are innovating at a speed never seen before while your traditional car manufacturers are stumbling over themselves trying to keep up.

        On the german side, just take a look at BMW and how long it took for them to come up with a competent electric platform. They just got their first car on a good platform (the new X3). Mercedes still doesn’t have a good EV, and neither does Audi. Their etron is outdated.

        Moving to the Japanese brands. I know Toyota isn’t focused on EVs at all and their hybrid is top notch so they’re one of the better ones out there. But no one else is even close. Not in terms of value for money. Not in terms of tech.

        The only ones that get close are Tesla because, like the Chinese, they’re running their car companies like tech companies and not car companies.

        • CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          20 hours ago

          What innovations are lacking specifically? I dont know of any features unique to Chinese brands. It seems more like you think every company should only be selling EVs for dirt cheap prices, but that isn’t realistic becausw those aren’t real prices and EVs aren’t yet practical for everyone which is why they make up such a small percentage of sales here still (though this number climbs with each quarter).

    • cabbage@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Chinese cars are heavily subsidized by the state. The reason they’re so cheap is because China bets it can squeeze the competition out of the market before charging basically whatever they want.

      I’ve seen Starbucks do the same thing to independent coffee shops.

      • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Chinese cars are heavily subsidized by the state

        Detroit has received $88B in subsidies and loans since 2008. That’s why we have so many cheap EV options?

      • Pollo_Jack@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Frankly, american cars could use a knockdown. Tesla was our only real hope, and we would have glided into a strong Tesla and EV empire if conservative dems didn’t bail out GM, Chrysler, and Ford.

        I’d say, let their stuff in. Lets get some good cheap and subsidizes vehicles from China on the condition that they don’t raise car prices by more than 2% a year.

        American companies will more than likely fall on their face and hopefully die. Making room for a new american car company to take their place.

      • halcyoncmdr@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        19 hours ago

        And yet even at 2-3x the price, the Chinese EVs provide a better value than the handful of the American options they would compete against.

        This SUV would be competing with the likes of a high end EV option like Lucid or Tesla. The Lucid Gravity starts a around $70k, and the Tesla Model X (now discontinued) was around $92k.

        The Xiaomi SU7 (the car the Ford CEO has driven since 2024, despite being banned in the US) starts at $32k and clearly is targeted to compete the Porsche Taycan at $112k.

        The vehicle in this article has heated floors, a projector, a pop-up roof, a fridge, swiveling seats, and over 1,000 miles of range. Functions western companies consider “luxury” are basically just standard in the Chinese market like heated and ventilated seats. They don’t even bother to advertise things like that because it’s a minimum expectation. There are zero western options that come close to something like that. The options available in the US suck, even taking industry subsidies into account.

        • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 hours ago

          heated floors, a projector, a pop-up roof, a fridge, swiveling seats,

          Never have I once thought I needed any of that bullshit.

          • halcyoncmdr@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 hours ago

            And yet there it is, along with basically every other “luxury” feature western companies save for high end models… all for the price of a base model SUV here.

        • Dead_or_Alive@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          21 hours ago

          Both statements can be true at the same time. But the scale of one is many times larger.

          China’s MO from rare earths and magnets to cars to silicon follows the same plan. Take IP, Subsidize the industry, Research, once you have a monopoly use it to squeeze adversaries.

          I will say at least China is willing to kill off underperforming companies.

          The US needs to let a lot of legacy companies that aren’t performing die off. It also needs to break up oligopolies in many industries. Why compete when you can buy up the future competitors and set prices with a handful of competitors. The financialization of our economy is choking us.

          • randompasta@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            21 hours ago

            Wrong. US manufacturers have effectively been shut out of China. But not before they made investments that China basically stole.

            • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 hours ago

              effectively been shut out of China.

              Because Chinese won’t buy massive thirsty trucks. Wtf…Tesla was in China before they even started making EVs.

              • randompasta@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                5 hours ago

                Depends on what you mean by American. Most assume you are referring to Ford or GM. But Tesla and Rivian are US made. Many are built in the States by non US companies. BMW, Volvo, Toyota, Honda, Nissan, Hyundai, Kia.

              • arrow74@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                12 hours ago

                I worked in the government for a bit, national park service if it matters, we were only allowed to use US made vehicles.

                Constant recalls, constant breakdowns, overall unreliable. These were all vehicles that were less than 5 years okd

                I have a 2007 toyota today that refuses to die and has barely needed any work. I’ll probably have it at least another 3 to 5 years at this rate.

                American cars are shit

                • Pollo_Jack@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  5 hours ago

                  Worked at an oil refinery in the US. All the company cars were Ford. They all had various issues such as lights not working, the reverse beeper not working, constant engine light. We would get a loaner ford to replace our fleet ford and the loaner would fucking die. It would be comical if it wasn’t my safety being jeopardized.

                • cabbage@piefed.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  12 hours ago

                  American capitalism has rendered companies incapable of producing anything that’s not crap at a scale because they need to maximise profit at all costs, while quality doesn’t mean shit. Every company is Boeing.

      • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        21 hours ago

        The United States greatly prefers that corporations be in charge of the government to government be in charge of corporations.

          • doben@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 hours ago

            That‘s a reach, if I ever saw one. China lifted more than 800 million people out of poverty, and in fact eradicated poverty at all. Last I heard, their standard of living just closely missed being in the high income countries category. Their trajectory is in complete contrast to the declining Western empire.

            China is better at capitalism, because it‘s their only play to stay sovereign and overcome this predatory system completely. They have to prove to the capitalist world, that their system and long term development is superior and it‘s only beneficial for the world to follow their transition towards socialism to enable prosperity for all humankind, not just the global north. Not gonna happen under capitalism, especially not under the US or the EU.

            Thank you for coming to my TED Talk.

    • Asetru@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Nah. It’s just another rug pull in preparation. Undercut prices until the competition breaks, then fuck things up with your monopoly. We’re in the undercutting prices phase, but the Chinese will want to have their fair share of interest on the subsidies they use use to do that right now. It’s the same old fucking capitalism again and nothing is saved from it.

      • cabbage@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Yeah. Companies running on state subsidies competing with others who are not is not capitalism “working”, it’s just another rug pull leaving us all fucked.

        • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          22 hours ago

          I guess in this fantasy scenario of yours, the United States is the one that doesn’t subsidize the auto industry? lol

          • cabbage@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            11 hours ago

            I love how criticizing the Chinese car industry leads people to asssume I love the American one.

            The US hasn’t produced a decent car since the 60s. I don’t even factor them into the calculation.

              • cabbage@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                9 hours ago

                Not to the same degree or in the same way. In the US the name of the game is to have companies run themselves into the ground to line the pockets of CEOs and investors, and then the state bailing them out every time because of jobs and national pride.

                I’m sure there are other systems in place as well, but frankly I don’t care. Teslas are pretty much the only American cars you’ll see in Europe, and they’ve been subsidized by European countries to promote the electronic transition.

                In short, I don’t think about American cars at all.

    • rafoix@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 hours ago

      My guess is that these Chinese manufacturers will kill the old automakers that are in rapid decline after decades of low quality products at high prices.

      I don’t know if the Chinese brands have good quality but they’re priced lower than the expensive low quality trash that’s already on the market from all the other automakers.

      • adarza@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        23 hours ago

        sell cheap to kill competition around the world. leverage new global monopoly for fun and profits later.

        • CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          20 hours ago

          They use this same tactic over and over and I find it surprising that more people don’t immediately recognize what they’re doing.

          • Grimy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            18 hours ago

            I guess it’s just more enticing than “maximise profits for the few even if it means the planet dying”. All western auto makers can get squeezed for all I care. I’d buy their products, but they spent a decade sabotaging it and making sure it keeps spewing poison.

            I have no pity for toxic companies that fought tooth and nail against EV development. The tactic works because it’s taking advantage of a broken system.

        • frongt@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          23 hours ago

          This. I’m all for competition and innovation, but this is subsidized by the Chinese government to exploit a lack of manufacturing in other countries.

          If you’ve heard about how food or clothing donations harm local farmers and weavers, same principle. We should be encouraging domestic production around the world, not allowing one country to undercut everyone else.

          • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            20 hours ago

            China is doing exactly what other countries and corporations do to establish and compete in markets.

            Let me repeat it: China is doing exactly what other countries and corporations do to establish and compete in markets.

            And because it doesn’t ever seem to sink in: China is doing exactly what other countries and corporations do to establish and compete in markets.

            Newsflash: Sinophobia is not an economic strategy.

            Edit: "“All for competition and innovation” The United States barred China from buying the latest NVIDIA chips to keep it out of AI. Typical American racist scapegoating.

            • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 hours ago

              This thread is so fucking ignorant and choking on MAGA propaganda. Look this up idiots: the US of A has subsidized Detroit far more than China in the auto industry and BYD was heavily invested by US investors like Warren Buffet.

              Warren Buffet bought 10% of BYD because US options were all losers. From 2008 to 2022 he made $8.75B.

          • pdxfed@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            22 hours ago

            China has been playing the long game for 30+ years. When you have actual history and strategy(and unlimited exploitable labor( you’d be amazed what you can accomplish.

        • sorghum@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          23 hours ago

          Don’t worry, I’m sure there’s another bailout and another cash for clunkers with a side of tariffs getting cooked up by some lobbyist to get passed by some paid off politicians. They are already trying to/already have pass(ed) a complete ban on Chinese autos. Knock knock, they are already on both borders.