• flop_leash_973@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    News flash to the press, its not the electric cars, the rockets, the concept of a social media platform, etc that makes these dudes undesirable. It is that they are genuinely shitty people that use the proceeds of those products to do shitty things.

  • GaryGhost@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    Without reading the article I would add that most women aren’t into the whole “save the planet by breeding with genius alpha tech bro’s” fantasy. It might even be turn off.

    • Garbagio@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      Right? I’m a swe, happily partnered up, and the times I was single, easily partnered up. The problem isn’t being a tech bro, the problem is being a fuckin wet noodle of a person. I’ve got the same hobbyist servers, the same half-finished coding projects I’ll never get done, the same 40k models, the same flab. I just also stand for good things and act on those beliefs, and live every day demonstrating that if you’re fash or fash-adjacent, you’re not safe here, and if you’re anti-those things then I’m great.

  • ℭ𝔞𝔱 @lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Complicated…

    I like guys like that, bad guys, I’m weird, nobody dates someone like me.

    I think women almost never like guys in the tech field. Because they find something strange or not very incessant enough

    • gray@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      For me it’s not just for people working in “immoral” tech, I also don’t date cops, landlords, people in the military or fossil fuels (might make exceptions for this one). For better or worse, whether you choose it or not, a job is a big part of someones life and it shapes who you are as a person.

    • myyass@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      I don’t think it’s that, it’s more like the intrepid dedication to work is a turn off for most people.

  • 404found@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Dang I was going to be a tech bro so I could be rich but if these hoes are choosing morals over money then maybe I will just get a part time job somewhere instead.

    • heartSagan5@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Nah, the hoes will still show because money attracts spenders. These tech bros have the personality of cardboard probably, and they’re delusional like Thiel and trying to find the Antichrist or “everything is a network”

    • Almacca@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      If you think of them as ‘hoes’ it probably won’t make any difference, but good luck!

      • 404found@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        The second sentence in the subtitle states “It’s made getting laid a whole lot harder”. That sentence set the precedent for my comment.

        The term is all semantics. I’m fine calling them women, men, trans, sexual partners, furries, one night stand, friends with benefits or whatever term fits best. You and I were just being sarcastic.

      • BigPotato@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        Maybe they don’t think of all women as hoes but instead specifically want to attract women of the hoe variety?

  • Axolotl@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    Short answer: they are just so deattached from reality that a person who married a waifu pales in comparasion

  • ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    Odd. A few of my buddies from grad school went to work for military contractors and if “I build inertial guidance systems for ballistic missiles” guy is happily married then maybe Palantir guy is just looking in the wrong place?

    • dreamkeeper@literature.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      Most Americans don’t care about defense contractors. They hurt foreigners we don’t know, unlike Palantir which intentionally hurts Americans in addition to foreigners.

  • NewDark@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    OK, framing it as just a tech company is kind of burying the lead. Yeah, a lot of them suck, but this is the nastiest evil one around.

      • clif@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        It’s Initrode now.

        And, yeah, when I tell people I work in tech the response is either “cool” or questions about what we do and how we do it, from the more geeky people. But I also don’t work for a company that “shortens the kill chain” or “connects the supply chain to the kill chain”

        EDIT : I want to be very clear that “Connecting the Supply Chain to the Kill Chain” is the real actual title of one of their advertising docs on their official website linked above.

        • dreamkeeper@literature.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          Palantir’s such a psychotically cringey company. Acting like flying a MacBook from a desk in Miami is some warrior shit. God I hate them so much. What’s worse is they actually do help kill people but never have to come face to face with it.

          On top of that their cringe is infecting other tech companies. Like the term “forward deployed engineer”. Because you know, implying that you’re at war with your customers is definitely healthy and appropriate.

      • NewDark@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        Even Tesla on paper builds cars. Yeah Elon is a Nazi, but it isn’t the panopticon company that’s also providing warcrimes software

        • dreamkeeper@literature.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          In the industry Tesla is known for being incredibly hostile towards women who work there. But yeah I doubt most people outside tech would know that, though they probably wouldn’t be surprised.

      • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        Ok, was surprised about that, so decided to look this up.

        It turns out this is correct, the expression does tend to use “lede” though “lead” is also occasionally used. You could call that occasional usage just people making a mistake, except for one thing… “Lede” is just an archaic English form of the word “lead” and they both mean “to guide”. So “burying the lead” is exactly the same statement as burying the lede", but with an archaic word replaced with the same modern word. So my question is, is that wrong?