• zikzak025@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    Gavin realizing he will never be president, so he is trying to secure his future as a Silicon Valley lobbyist.

  • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    he was always there to serve the rich nothing more. even his own father was defending rich people as a lawyer. and thats why he had no influence out of moteray, when he was still in the state congress for a while.

  • FE80@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    This guy is auditioning for the 2028 Democratic presidential nomination.

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      dont think he needs it, the DNC likely determined already. hes just giving himself more exposure so that people vote on him based on recognizability alone. thats also how trump won too, being in MEDIA alot helped him.

      • merc@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        I’ve never heard of the MEDIA alot, but that species has alot of members.

        It’s amazing how brainwashed people are by TV. Trump was a blowhard business failure, but the TV show made him seem like some kind of decisive business genius, so people voted for that. I wouldn’t be surprised if Zelenski was elected to lead Ukraine because he’d played the role on TV previously. A lot of it is unconscious, so people aren’t going to admit that that’s the reason why, but it has to be a factor.

        I’m sure it’s related to parasocial relationships and to stalkers. People think they know someone personally because they see them on TV or in movies, or hear them on the radio, or whatever.

  • boaratio@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    So he’s full mask off at this point. I mean we all knew this, but now he’s saying the quiet part out loud.

  • mr_rusty_shackleford@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    Feel like an outlier here, but creating a billionaire tax at the state level seems ridiculous, and would actually harm the state. It is so easy to move the money outside the jurisdiction of that state to another when you are that wealthy, so the only effective way to implement would be at the federal level. Can someone help me understand why a state level billionaire tax makes sense?

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      billionaires arnt going to live in redstate hellholes like missouris/misssipi, unless its an wealthy community, but they wont do businesses there.

    • hazard_iguana@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      You’re not an outlier, but it’s where the current political climate sits. State governments have to do something because the federal government, headed by a facist, has withheld funds from states it deems enemies.

      The difference between trying to get rid of a leech on the government and just sitting there and taking it is pretty clear to me. If they leave… so be it, billionaires don’t create jobs, the companies full of employees do. At the point they become billionaires, they are likely trying their hardest to reduce jobs as well.

      But also California is a very nice place to live and people want to live here. It’s not like you can just say “I don’t reside in California” and not pay the tax either. The FTB has the 5th largest economy in the world behind it, it will determine if you have residency in CA or not regardless if you say you don’t. And it’s in their best interest to put the time and effort into proving it for the billionaires that want to try.

    • Lodespawn@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      Didn’t New York already do it and it proved that billionaires will stay put and not move to a hick backwater just to save a few bucks they wouldnt even notice losing?

      • mr_rusty_shackleford@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        What they did is very different. They taxed residential properties not used as primary residences valued over 5 million. The CA tax is a one time 5% tax on the worldwide net worth of billionaires.

        • obvs@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 days ago

          Or, and hear me out, the states that they move to could follow suit and completely negate the ridiculous argument to begin with.

    • Hello_there@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      Somebody has to do it, and waiting for the death of the filibuster to have anything get done is a terrible idea

  • inari@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    The one good thing here is he’s made it clear who’s his boss (and it isn’t the people)

  • roofuskit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    Let’s all be clear, this is him campaigning for president.

    What, the, fuck. What goddamn idiots are advising Democratic candidates?

    • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      Not idiots, or well not just idiots. Representing the interests of the rich is his job with everything else being secondary. This is the default state of a neoliberal regardless of intelligence. The target of this message is American billionaires, not you.