I made a minimal website using Hugo just for writing blogs so I don’t have to post them in groups as posts. Hope it’s fine here. This is not a promotion. No tracking links either.

    • Gonzako@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      Here in Spain it was because WhatsApp took over cuz carriers charged for SMS and phone calls. Now there’s a massive captive audience that self-reinforces. Same with Instagram if you’re young or Facebook if you like having your brain melted

    • Hueristic_Autistic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      Because instant messaging died out. Then it seemed like you were nothing if you weren’t sharing the bitchiness of your life. Then tumblr died out. Now we’re at the enshittification of it, with algorithms curating everything with an advertisement every three scrolls and an Ai post every two it’s basically every one wheel scroll is your family and friends then three scrolls down you’re seeing your memes.

      It’s shit.

      • NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        None of those things would have made me interested in starting to use non anonymous services. We learned not to do that years prior to its arrival. Took one look and went hell no.

        Now we’re at the enshittification of it,

        Maybe, but it was always bad. Always. It was a bad idea from the beginning. No person who thought about it for 5 minutes should have thought it was ever a good idea.

        Thats why when Zucks quote called the users dumbfucks for just handing over their data to him, it was no surprise. Thats what the facebook user was from the beginning: a dumbfuck.

  • DreamsK@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    I gave up on Facebook. I’ve been using the MEWE platform for a long time. I replaced YouTube with Odysee. And for messengers I have Signal, Viber, Line, Telegram, Ratspeak.

    • matlag@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      Same as what it took to have it take the whole market: a better alternative and enough advertisement for a critical mass of people to migrate at once, so that they stay active there.

      Then the rest will flock more or less progressively.

    • Fluffy Kitty Cat@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      The first people have to abandon the idea that they’re only allowed to use one product of a category at a time. It will not kill you to use to chat apps, it will not kill you to use two microblogging services. The second is that you need to prioritize the better one when you can. This eliminates lock-in effects which are a major moat

      • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        Yeah I have texting, signal and discord on my phone for different people, it’s pretty seamless to use all 3.

  • Auli@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    The only problem is market place. If you want to seel of buy something locally. Everyone has switched to that.

        • datavoid@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 days ago

          My area already has two competitors, but they are dead in comparison. It would be amazing if they took off, but currently Marketplace is sort of the only real option.

            • NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 days ago

              Exactly! People keep saying “but everyone uses it”.

              That is such a lame excuse. Yes you will lose convenience. In my country not having whatsapp is basically not having a phone number, but I am doing it anyway because I refuse to participate. Change isn’t going to happen while people wait for it, you have to stand up for what you believe in.

        • matlag@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 days ago

          We had a competitor in Canada, way before Marketplace: Kijiji.

          It is not nearly dead yet, but if you want to avoid Meta at all cost, be ready to miss a good 80–90% of buyers and sellers (estimate provided by the Royal Institute of Guessworking).

          That means there are things you’ll never find even if they are sold. And things you’ll never sell even if there are people looking for them.

          The main difference between them is marketplace is embedded in FB app. You can search FB and find offers. That’s it. That’s how it won.

          For most people, FB is just convenient: all in one app. Why install another? With another registration. Another site to browse. etc.

          Building a competitor… easier said than done!

    • vk8kv@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      the worst of meta’s sins, the web hasn’t been the same since React took along

      • melfie@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        It unfortunately became a hammer for every nail. IMO, it’s a great tool when a SPA is actually merited.

  • Zak@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    Because of not having enough time and money to maintain the app, like the implementation of encryption and new features, founders Jan Koum and Brian Acton accepted the deal and sold the app for $19 billion to Mark Zuckerberg.

    I imagine I’d also find that I don’t have enough time and money to maintain something if someone offered me $19 billion for it.

    • FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      Yah. Most ppl would. Not all! But most.

      Which creates a perverse incentive, right? The ppl making s/w with no malware, no spyware, they are lucky if they even make a living. Often they do it volunteer, or for low income. But those who do it to amass power, and sell that power to somebody, as here, they can roll in money.

      To fix the whole s/w world, I believe we must fix the bad incentives. Might be lots of ways to do it, but it certainly helps a lot, if most ppl shun spyware. And support OSS authors who are genuine about keeping it out. Right now, most ppl do the opposite.

      • Zak@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        To be fair to Brian Acton, afterward, he did co-found the Signal foundation and give it a hundred million dollar zero-interest loan.

        • dropdrip@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 days ago

          Hang on… that’s not a gift. The hard work is making money from free software. You’ve indebted a foundation to the sum of $100,000,000.00 and you’re telling them:

          A) pay it back

          B) via commercializing free software

          How the fuck do you do that? You can’t. What the fuck does a piece of software need that exorbitant amount for anyway? I guess that’s why Signal never really was libre software. There’s too much money to be made in spyware.

          • porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 days ago

            Generally couldn’t agree more, but

            What the fuck does a piece of software need that exorbitant amount for anyway?

            For a widely used chat app with calling and video calling, servers.

            • dropdrip@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 days ago

              A self-inflicted burden because they refuse to liberate the server side code. Besides, they can’t be burning through that reserve as they need to pay it back and how on earth are they going to do that?

      • Fluffy Kitty Cat@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        I only ever made a Facebook account because of one club in college that never posted their meeting time and location, which changed, anywhere else and you couldn’t access it without an account. Believe me I tried. The last time I interacted with that account was a couple years ago when I Got a notification that someone tried to log into it so I went and changed the password just to make sure no one would be impersonating me. I didn’t give them more information than was necessary. I don’t know that I even uploaded a photo of myself. In the people you may know section I only ever saw one person that I actually knew, which means I was probably doing something right

  • Poxlox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    I really want to. But around here it’s the de facto Craigslist, really really good for farm supplies and all sorts of used things. And well people use it for the events side, and there’s lots of specific interest groups that are very active and informative. Which is why it’s so hard for me to leave despite the fact I’d enjoy it if Zuck chucks himself into a volcano. I suppose I can just keep making sure I dont click a single ad, though I’m sure they’re making money off me somehow. A frustrating situation.

  • PattyMcB@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    A lot of what is in this article is already common knowledge. And there’s definitely a “sky is falling” spin to it.

    Meta is shit and Zuck can kiss my ass, but the article is a bit sensational.