NOTE: I am NOT defending AI or it’s usage or anything like that. So just tie that horse right back up at the kitchen sink. I don’t like the whole AI thing. This post is not about AI.

I get that it was necessary at first, but now whenever there’s any hint of AI, there’s a great chorus of everyone saying the same thing ‘AI slop bla bla bla’ like a gaggle of sheep jerking their knees.

It’s not fucking helpful. It only sows even more division among the peasants, while the oligarchs take zero notice and continue on as usual. The correct way to engage with AI content you don’t like is just not at all.

Examples:

Recently I watched as a post for a community event was removed, because it had an AI image. The image was not requested or created by the organiser, it was provided to them, and had information in several languages. But the post was removed because AI slop and now there is less human connection happening. Yay. Well fucking done. You literally are helping the AI overlords now.

I’ve seen many actual legit digital artists getting hit with the cries of AI slop and even banned, when they have been making art for years before AI was even a thing. People actually can’t tell the difference half the time when they think they can, and end up hurting real artists.

Now is not the time to be attacking each other over using AI to generate some stupid meme. There are much, MUCH bigger issues at stake right now, and calling everything AI slop does nothing to help.

/rant

  • BeardededSquidward@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    28 minutes ago

    Yup, an unpopular opinion.

    I’d argue there’s absolutely no moral usage of it because it’s a tool of the oligarchs to devaule workers further and further. AI media slop is a real problem, if you allow any of it then where is the line at which you stop then?

    • Auth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      16 minutes ago

      how is it a tool of the oligarchs to devalue workers? It can be used by any worker for a tiny cost and the models themselves are a pretty competitive space with very little signs of any of the big companies having a moat.

      AI media slop would be a problem if the content on these platforms wasnt already the worst shit possible.

      • BeardededSquidward@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 minutes ago

        The fact they see it as a replacement for certain workers for cost cutting it the entire reason. You don’t think they’ll validate that if AI can do X of your job you deserve less money? Nothing about AI is to help YOU, the worker, it’s to help THEM the business.

  • Fierro@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I dislike it too, but I strongly disagree, ai slop is much worse and you have to be loud because of how strongly it is forced upon us.

  • 🌞 Alexander Daychilde 🌞@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 hours ago

    This particular opinion is popular with me, only because one of the things that got SO tiring on reddit was scrolling past all the FAAAAAKE FFFFEEEEAAAAAAAKKKKKEEEE FAKE AKF EKA FKEF FEEEAAAAKKKEEE comments on any submission that happened before AI, or SCRIPTEDDDDDDDD on any video that might be a sketch or might even be legit. Those people now stroke their genitals while posting AAAAAAIIIIIII SSSSLLLLOOOPPPPPPPPPP.

    So either it is these things or it isn’t, but   S H U T   T H E   F U C K   U P . Jesus fucking christ.

    That said, AI slop sucks.

  • John@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Truly an unpopular opinion.

    Fuck AI and everybody using it

  • 0x52534B@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Feels like MLK’s quote fits right here

    I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro’s great stumbling block in his stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen’s Counciler or the Ku Klux Klanner, but the white moderate, who is more devoted to “order” than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice

  • MoonRaven@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Anyone can post Ai slop by accident. It’s how you handle it. And if you do it on purpose, you know what side you’re on. I’m fine with people acknowledging that they used something they didn’t intent to.

  • GarboDog@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Ok, but you’re saying AI is a problem, but we shouldn’t call it out along with other issues? Nah, we’ll call out whats slop: slop.

    Overall you’re saying it’s not actually about AI but it’s literally feeling pro ai, and none of us are conformists, especially when it comes from horrendous shit/actions to individual instigators.

    • ∟⊔⊤∦∣≶@lemmy.nzOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Well you could instead say something like, “You shouldn’t use AI for images, it massively harms the environment and has a huge societal cost that we will all pay.” Engage with the person, not the content. That’s far more effective.

  • abc@suppo.fi
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Thanks for this honeypot. Lots of great assholes to block in the comments.

  • Victor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Upvoted for very unpopular opinion.

    Yes, let’s just ignore all the bad things happening around us. Great idea.

    • ∟⊔⊤∦∣≶@lemmy.nzOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Not ignore, find better ways to deal with it.

      Well you could instead say something like, “You shouldn’t use AI for images, it massively harms the environment and has a huge societal cost that we will all pay.”

      Engage with the person, not the content. That’s far more effective.

  • fbn@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 hours ago

    dont blame the anti-slop crowd for the problems created by the stupid jerks destroying our only livable planet for profit

    it’s OUR fault that the dogshit that is getting plastered everywhere is causing a backlash?

    unpopular for sure, despite its thoughtlessness, have an upvote

    • ∟⊔⊤∦∣≶@lemmy.nzOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 hours ago

      The last one I saw made me cringe so hard I needed reconstructive surgery.

      It was of a woman on a bed reading the bible to her kids while shielding them from the trans rainbow.

      Yeah, I know, it hurts, I hope you have cheap medical care.

  • bootstrap@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Not calling it out is akin to not calling out anything else unethical.

    See a parent hitting their child? Shut up and move along.

    AI data center being built in your neighbourhood? SHUT UP, JUST DONT USE IT.

    Someone littering on your street? Stop whinging, just ignore it and it will eventually blow in to the ocean - all good!

    If no one speaks up, then it just gets worse. Protest is fundamental to pushing back against the horse shit that corpos try and push down our throats every day. Someone less informed may take the lack of negative comments towards AI slop as it being OK and normal when it clearly isnt, therefore adding to the problem.

    Hard disagree with your opinion and I think it comes across as corpo cuckery so you get an upvote I guess.

    • ∟⊔⊤∦∣≶@lemmy.nzOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Well you could instead say something like, “You shouldn’t use AI for images, it massively harms the environment and has a huge societal cost that we will all pay.”

      Engage with the person, not the content. That’s far more effective.