My how fast the AI tech bros move to protect corporations but don’t move to protect the average coder, artists, writers.

  • mousefad@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    “It’s so powerful! You’re only allowed to use it how we want you to”.

    Allowed eh? How about go fuck yourself?

  • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    Hot take:

    This is a good thing.

    Claude Code is the “lowest common denominator.” It’s the default, zero research option. Its where you go if you follow popular trends.

    If you actually want to reverse engineer, help code a game or something, there are hundreds of capable, uncensored LLM APIs to do that. Hacker communities will eventually figure that out, and finally realize Claude isn’t unique, and that Anthropic is toxic.

    But for lazy spammers who don’t know that and aren’t motivated to seek stuff out… well, if this makes their life more difficult, good. If this sabotages Anthropic, that’s good too.

  • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    To those who say “but what about game preservation?”:

    GenAI slop ruined communities around game preservation. And for every time a AAA dev getting this treatment, there’s at least 3 indies getting it worse.

    • starelfsc2@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      Yep a lot of decomps just get a slop coded version and people stop caring about it because the slop version is “good enough.” Most people doing the decomps it’s also a hobby project that they’re doing for fun as well, the end goal is just a bonus.

      • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        There’s already a meme that a lot of those decomps are just emulators + ROMs in a single repository.

  • Fierro@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    I’m hopeful this is positive, they’ll start loosing a lot more to Chinese models and I can assure you local models will blow up too.

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    Is this in response to that new “reverse engineer anything” tool from the people that reverse engineered the Adobe suite?

    • chewypoops@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      I’m really tired of the lie that ArtCraft is “reverse engineered Photoshop”.

      It’s a slop factory. If you don’t believe me, download it and run it yourself. It’s just a frontend for tons of image and video GenAI bullshit. It doesn’t resemble Photoshop in the slightest, that narrative is pure marketing.

      And it’s only “free” in the sense that you can download it for free. The first thing they ask you to do when you launch the program is buy tokens from them.

    • HaraldvonBlauzahn@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      The adobe suite was not reverse engineered, in the sense in which the term is applied to binary, closed-source softeware. Rather, it was cloned.

      This is technically and often also legally very different. Cloning is a new implementation of a system which reproduces the abstract API of an existing System. Since APIs are not subject to copyright law, this is legally unproblemaric. It is also a creative process (so far). For exsmple, Linux is a clone of AT & T Unix.

      Reverse engineering uses techniques like analysing the internal behaviour and decompiling the binary code of an existing product. It is im general not illegal, but it can violate license agreements and is more in a grey area. Laws like the DMCA might also apply if some kind of copy protection is used.

      BTW, many Linux drivers are reverse enginnered to some degree.

      • demonsword@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        For exsmple, Linux is a clone of AT & T Unix.

        Unless your definition of “clone” is very different from the mainstream one, you’re talking out of your ass here. Linux was written from scratch. The only thing they’ve got in common is being POSIX-compliant.

        • HaraldvonBlauzahn@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          5 days ago

          Yeah, it clones the Unix / POSIX API: Programs written for Unix will run on Linux. In the same way, the Photoshop/Office lookalikes are clones, they were written from scratch to yield a result compatible to the original.

          Look at the explanations I linked.

    • sanzky@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      of course. anyone who thinks AI can be used as a tool for independence is deluding themselves

  • kippininreal@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    So this is how these companies are going to safeguard against IP theft lawsuits! Leave our theft be, or we’ll tell everyone how to get in.

    Also it’s incredibly telling how Anthropic doesn’t add code to stop suicide ideation in teens (what they are their ilk are being sued for) but can somehow very quickly stop reverse engineering. A tool that values the captial holders through & through. Their “democratization of intelligence” schtick is obvious now.

    OpenSource frontier models ASAP! Obviously never gonna happen, but a fool can dream atleast.

    • HaraldvonBlauzahn@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      Also it’s incredibly telling how Anthropic doesn’t add code to stop suicide ideation in teens (what they are their ilk are being sued for) but can somehow very quickly stop reverse engineering.

      This.

  • tgcoldrockn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    Don’t worry! Its STILL okay to reverse engineer the work of photographers artists writers actors voice over musicians modelers animators academics etc etc (feel free to add. the exploitation is literally everywhere!)

    • Leon@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      Only if you’re a corporation! If you’re a filthy worker then you have no rights.

  • arararagi@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    It’s not ok when the commoners get some power back huh. What a shame, I’ve been loving playing my favorite console fps games as a kid, now with keyboard and mouse support.

  • luciferofastora@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    The task Large Language Models are best at is pattern correlation. Out of all the possible applications, reverse-engineering seems the most reasonable use case to me.

    But figuring out how stuff works is the exact opposite of what they want vibe coders to do: Don’t think, don’t train your own skills, just trust the machine. And if it doesn’t work, just prompt again and keep wasting more tokens, pushing the usage metrics to convince investors they’re constantly growing, burning the planet and your company’s money.

  • kerryh8er04@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    Man, the one thing I was interested in, the decompiling of abandoned software to get old games and software back, is being limited.

    • Wataba@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      This was literally destroying indie games. Look at the deluge of slop that came out when ‘sort items onto shelves’ kicked off as a game type.

      • LePoisson@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        It’s interesting to see modern day “shovelware” is still around. The problem of shitty clones and rip offs of popular games has always been around. Or the classic bait and switch of advertising vs actual gameplay.

        The proliferation of these things made possible through the internet and sites like itch.io and sped up by lazy AI slop has certainly made it even more pronounced. The difficulty of finding good indie games amongst a huge pile of trash has only grown.

        That’s what late stage capitalism mixed with desperation, delusion, and the desire to get rich quick will get you though.

      • arararagi@ani.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 days ago

        Indies have been copied since Unity introduced the asset store, don’t fool yourself, this is made to stop the reverse engineering of big company games and apps, not the little guy.

    • bollvirtuoso@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      Would you spend 13 years making GTA VI if it was going to be cracked day 1? Why bother? Just let the users vibe code it.

      • arararagi@ani.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 days ago

        That’s literally what happens to every game on PC and jailbroken consoles, you can pirate Witcher 3 since launch and it still sold more than 10 million copies.

        • bollvirtuoso@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 days ago

          That’s fair. But, like, you couldn’t build that exact game back from the crack, could you? Like, you can’t decompile to machine code and understand everything in a game that complex usually. The cracks tend to be getting past DRM, but rarely allow you to fundamentally-alter the source code, or learn to make the exact same game within six to eight hours of release. This is new paradigm and pretending it’s the exact same as before is, I think, gently, a little disingenuous.

        • ɔiƚoxɘup@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 days ago

          Exactly, and that’s why they fucked the ram priced before they kicked into high gear, to repress us

          • SpaghettiMaster@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 days ago

            But we do own RAM, do they plan to buy all of it indefinitely? All sorts of other businesses still need computers so they will be buying them even if they cost more, and when they replace them the old ones can be sold off.

            There is even the possibility of crowd sourced AI, I know AI horde exists although I think its pretty small and I haven’t touched it in a few years now.

            • ɔiƚoxɘup@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 days ago

              I don’t know what their plans are, but I wouldn’t be surprised if they tried to buy all of it indefinitely.

              It seems clear to me that they are betting on that they will not have to buy all of it indefinitely, and they will reach singularity before the Bill comes due. I don’t think that’ll happen, but I do think until the bubble pops, we’re gonna be kind of fucked on pricing.

            • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 days ago

              crowd sourced AI

              So the problem here is that every machine would have to run an instance of some model, you can’t spread the model over all the machines. It’d be too slow. Reading from NVMe on your very own machine is already pretty slow as it is. Kinda limits the model size.

  • ripcord@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    But isn’t this also protecting small authors from having their stuff quickly reverse engineered and cloned

        • inclementimmigrant@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 days ago
          1. Woosh.
          2. And what does your question have to do with the article?

          Also, do you have any inkling of what is used to train these LLM and generative AI models? I’m sure that these companies buying literally tons of books and then shredding them is to “protect” independent authors like good stewards of AI they are.