Tired of misleading cookie banners? The EU Commission has finally proposed a solution: set your privacy preferences in the browser once, and never see another banner. Unfortunately, the tracking industry is pushing back – and so far, they’ve been successful. We need YOUR help to #KillTheCookieBanner!

  • Fmstrat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    Woa, fun to see this on Lemmy. I’ve got an IETF draft out and am working with some people on an option to solve this (including a major cookie banner provider).

  • SirLeToet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    I would wish the EU would be more strict in its laws. Cookiebanners are NOT required when you only use functional cookies that the website technically needs to work. I never had to show the banner for my websites, because I simply don’t include 3rd party bullshit, no ads, no tracking.

    Same with the new age rating rules, websites and communities that aim at CHILDREN are required to not be invasive when checking for age (ID checks are last fucking resorts!). If your website or community is obviously 18+, like porn, gore and such websites. There is no requirement for an age check!

    Fuck the companies abusing our EU systems and that put the EU in a bad spotlight because of RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE social media ragebait.

    Why the fuck is it socially acceptable for billion dollar (foreign!) tech companies to manipulate our children?

    Why did we normalize getting our asses spied on? And why are we accepting the excuse of these tech companies to scan our ID’s and passports?

    The GDPR does not allow scanning of identity cards/passports except for a very limited section. Like: banks, your employer, your health insurance and your government. These tech companies are not on the GDPR VIP list.

  • 0xDREADBEEF@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    The EU back when they were deciding GDPR decided not to use the browser’s “do not track me”. The W3C even tried to help them and during the making of GDPR a commission even recommended using DNT signals.

    Capitalism and advertisers won of course and they decided not to follow DNT signals from the browser. Why will they change their mind this time?

  • slazer2au@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    I am in favour. Until then you can use consent-o-mattic to actively deny cookies instead of just hiding the element.

    • 3scene@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      Denying consent is just 1 part of the puzzle. You will still be accepting all “legitimate interests”.

    • GalacticGrapefruit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      I was about to recommend Consent-O-Matic! Digi-gods bless Aarhus University and their compsci students for building something so wonderfully useful.