The products covered by the obligation to repair currently include:

  • washing machines and washer-dryers
  • dishwashers
  • refrigerators
  • electronic displays
  • welding equipment
  • servers and data storage products
  • mobile phones, cordless phones and tablets
  • tumble dryers
  • e-bikes and e-scooters batteries (from 18 February 2027)
  • local space heaters
    • gandalf_der_13te@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      well, one thing that surely is not repairable about apple is their software. you can’t fix their operating system by installing a more meaningful alternative to it on your device, can you?

    • pwalker@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      I have to admit that I haven’t checked ifix scores for a hot minute and am surprised that since the iphone 15 Apple consistently beats all other big brands in reparability score. Before that of course they were bad, which is probably why people remember them that way. I like that trend, hopefully Samsung and Google also hop on that bandwaggon any time soon.

      • GoatSynagogue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        Strange that 73 other people, 30+ of who downvoted long after I added the proof, think that ifixit are wrong.

        • pwalker@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 day ago

          I don’t think they have a problem with the ifixit scores, more with the words you have chosen to convey your message. Also of course you will not find any love for Big Tech in the Fediverse ;-)

        • Tetsuo@jlai.lu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          Personally I downvoted you because you completely forgive/forget the older devices from Apple.

          They had sold approximately 2.2 billions of impossible to repair devices before they kind of changed course with the iPhone 14 line.

          • GoatSynagogue@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            23 hours ago

            But those devices don’t have to meet these laws, so they’re irrelevant.

            I also didn’t say they have always been great, I said they’ve been at the forefront for years, which is true. Their recent phones are easier to repair than almost any other phones on the market.

      • GoatSynagogue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        Edited to add the single best source there is for the doubters and downvoters. Take a look.

        You only need a screwdriver set and maybe some rubbing alcohol.

      • SlurpingPus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        Sounds like this is to prevent theft for parts. Considering it says right there that parts can be unlocked with the user’s account. So it’s the same mechanism that makes a stolen iPhone non-functional unless unlocked by the user.

          • SlurpingPus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 day ago

            Ask the previous owner to remove the locking, same way as they would need to if you bought the device to use it. What’s the problem?

            Again, says right there they should just remove the device from ‘Find my’, which disables Activation Lock, the very same feature that prevents theft for reselling the device for regular use.

            Instead of using Repair Assistant to unlock the part, you can remove Activation Lock using Find My.

                • lime!@feddit.nu
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  no but i’m not talking about me. i’m talking about tyler, 27, who just gets a new phone and doesn’t care about whatever accounts the old one had, so he throws it away and now the parts are available at a repair shop.

      • GoatSynagogue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Same Apple. Signing new parts to your device is incredibly simple and DIY now.

        https://www.ifixit.com/repairability/smartphone-repairability-scores

        PROS
        • Display and battery repairs are well-prioritized, though not as well as in other (dual-entry) iPhone models.
        • Torx screws secure the battery assembly in place, making replacements straightforward.
        • Repair parts and instructions are available straight from Apple.
        CONS
        • Five different screwhead types and the continued reliance on adhesives complicate basic repairs.
          • GoatSynagogue@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            I wouldn’t want to be putting second hand parts in my phone when repairing it. I can’t imagine there are many second hand screens or batteries around for sale given they’re the things that are replaced the most.

            Not that I’d ever want a second hand screen or battery anyway.

    • blargh513@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Are we talking about the same apple that invented a new type of screw to keep people from taking their phones apart? The same apple that once people could get a trilobe driver, then made it so that generic replacement screens would not work because of some protection from non-apple hardware? Then went on to make sure that you can’t use non-apple parts in a laptop?

      • GoatSynagogue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        At home with minimal tool requirements

        https://www.ifixit.com/repairability/smartphone-repairability-scores

        PROS
        • Display and battery repairs are well-prioritized, though not as well as in other (dual-entry) iPhone models.
        • Torx screws secure the battery assembly in place, making replacements straightforward.
        • Repair parts and instructions are available straight from Apple.
        CONS
        • Five different screwhead types and the continued reliance on adhesives complicate basic repairs.
        • testaccount372920@piefed.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          Not bad by the standards of modern phones, but hopefully not good enough for the new EU standards. Imo adhesives should only be used if they’re replaceable or reusable and the screws should be limited to philips and flatheads.

          • ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 day ago

            PH screws can go to hell, they fucking suck I hate them. Flathead is just kind of annoying. Torx all the way, they are superior in every way.

          • GoatSynagogue@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            No thank you on the flathead or Philips head screws, they get burred too easily which would basically leave your phone unrepairable.

            The less adhesives the better though, agreed there. Their phones are already definitely self-repairable enough for the new EU rules.

          • 9bananas@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 days ago

            hard disagree on the screws:

            philps and flatheads can be damaged too easily: torx or nothing!

            these teeny tiny screws are really finicky and both philips and flatheads are prone to slipping, causing faster wear and easily leading to stripped screws…

            any design that is inherently resistant to that is a must for small parts!

            source: worked in a repair shop ;)

            • testaccount372920@piefed.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 days ago

              Sure thing, I don’t care much about the specific screw type, just that it’s a type that’s commonly available so you don’t need a unique screwdriver for each device you own.

              • unwarlikeExtortion@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                9 hours ago

                Torx screws are almost as common as philips and flatheads as they’re long out of patent protection and vastly superior.

                It’s almost impossible to strip them without actively trying, unlike the others mentioned.