• mrmaplebar@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    Oh NOW you care about stealing intellectual property!

    Fuck off. What’s good for the goose is good for the gander, AI assholes.

  • Craccoon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    I couldn’t care less. Just make cheaper products with near or on par performance and you’re okay in my book.

  • rafoix@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    Samsung uses monopoly tactics and government support to bankrupt smaller companies and then raise prices. They’re scum.

    RAM is so important to the world economy that their patents should be made public.

  • Courtney (she/her/they) @lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    In a better world, all of these technologies that get stolen by various corpo espionage and reverse engineering teams would be freely shared with the world so everyone can benefit from them, and people not in the dev teams might have improvements they can suggest.

    But instead we have a bunch of rich adult children who would rather take the ball and go home because they don’t think they’ve recieved enough praise for bringing it, and wanting to charge everyone just to look at it.

    It’s not a great metaphor, but honestly dealing with companies and governments feels a lot like dealing with children you aren’t allowed to discipline or even talk sternly to because their parents have forbidden you from interfering.

    • chris@l.roofo.cc
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      The thing is that with the current laws, even if China would open source all the info they have gathered, companies in other countries couldn’t use it.

    • Croquette@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      Let’s not forget that mega corpos benefit heavily from government subsidized R&D in universities, insert themselves within the R&D and claim innovation as their own.

      Tech is built on FOSS and private corporations act like they invented butter.

      • ladicius@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        You mean 40 years of delay for the destruction of our biosphere?

        It’s call that a win.

        • ozymandias117@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 days ago

          40 years of burning far more coal than necessary due to inefficient engines

          Whether the overall effect was positive or negative with respect to the biome, no clue

          • jdr@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 days ago

            Yes, but also induced demand. More efficient engines means less coal per task, but more tasks, maybe so many more that total coal use increases.

            • ozymandias117@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 days ago

              That’s why I said we don’t know the overall effect on the biome due to less efficient engines

              With how quickly we industrialized, my intuition is we were mining and burning it as fast as possible, but maybe more efficient engines could have let us mine and burn even more

  • wedge@multiverse.soulism.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    Guessing they won’t get much in the way of public sympathy given they’re bending consumers over the barrel. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.

  • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    Proving all this in court could give Samsung a powerful weapon moving forward. Legal experts believe the company might take sworn statements straight to the US International Trade Commission, a body with the authority to block foreign products from entering the country entirely.

    Which does not help because not every country will ban them and The other manufacturers will then have less demand and therefore have to reduce their prices in order to continue selling the same amount

    Edit: Doing so may slow the rate of the price decline in the US, but it will not stop it.