Yeah and like anything getting big, here we are, Discord trying to go public and fuck everything over. The cow is fat enough to be milked then butchered until it’s nothing but bones and scraps.

It’s so long ago that my memory might fail me. Skype didn’t need a hosted server and that made it accessible.

Wasn’t Skype the best audio/video protocol at the time? Everything else around it was terrible, but I remember that skype was the only voice call software that worked well for me on shitty connection back in the day.

I split my docker containers so that I can selectively backup what I want easily on proxmox

For example, I am currently running an Abiotic Factor server that I don’t care to backup. So I just dont add the container to the backups and I am done.

Proxmox is a great starting point for self hosting. You don’t need advanced features to start, and you can easily create VMs and containers.

I work as an embedded developer and when a new board is produced and half tested, every one expects fully functional code off the bat, right away.

Motherfucker, you didn’t even qualify your hardware and you expect my code, that hasn’t hit the new board, to be 100% functional, based on your mind map? We will find hardware issues that will inevitably be blamed on the code and spend hours “debugging” the code to eventually find out the hardware is shit.

Crazy that they got 116 millions for that.

You can share my tinfoil if you’d like. I got enough for both of us.

Still not explaining why you are saying this is a dishonest framing?

That’s the current scenario though.

Photographer is using Ozzy’s fame to cash in on the photo, it’s not like there was an arrangement here.

How is it dishonest? If Ozzy wasn’t famous, that wouldn’t be an issue.

This is the snake eating its tail.

The photographer only took photos because he was famous. The photographer is getting money from someone else’s work.

But the person you are profiting from cannot use the photographs because he is profiting from your work?

I understand that legally, there is a set of laws to manage that. But ethically that is fucked up that the person you took a photo from didn’t give you permission and you profit from their notoriety, but that person cannot use the photos himself.

There is a difference between you going to a photographer asking him to take photos of you and a paparazzi taking a photo of you in a public setting.

That’s the best no context quote of the year so far.

If they change course in the next 5 years, so be it. But right now, Jeep took some dev time to develop this, meaning they plan to use it at some point.

They deserve to lose the trust of the consumer because they gave us a peek behind the curtain and it fucking sucks.

Stop being pro-corpo, they are not your friend and they will piss on your corpse if that means they get a dollar more.

I love how that saying this is a software glitch is somehow supposed to make it okay? Motherfuckers, you took time and money to develop the thing. In doesn’t matter that it wasn’t supposed to be deployed right now. It matters that it was developed at all.

This is my tinfoil opinion, but I wouldn’t be surprised that it was done on purpose to gauge the public reaction and setting the pace of rollout.

The timing is too perfect knowing damn well that Republicans won’t legislate that.

Oh I totally agree with that. It’s dumb that there is so many systems that use SSNs as an identification.

My identity infos have been leaked with the Desjardins leaks, so my SSN is forever known and all the critical services that uses SSNs are now more vulnerable.

Not really. I haven’t worked with a TI mcu for a while so I can’t talk about their mcu docs, but their sections describing data exchanges between the IC and your mcu usually has a lot of ambiguity that needs to be clarified through trial and error.

I am not sure if you are agreeing with me or not, but DOB and location where you were born are additional informations as I mentioned in my replie before.

You can guess a phone number as well by changing the last number, but that information has 0 value unless it is coupled with other informations.