• Airfried@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    19 hours ago

    I mean everything China manages to catch up on quickly is either bought or reverse engineered stolen goods. That’s why they’re so “good” at catching up. They don’t have to innovate. They only have to copy and mass produce to get good at it.

  • minorkeys@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    20 hours ago

    China steals IP and uses it to keep pace with innovation they are incapable of producing themselves. More news at eleven.

  • Eternal192@anarchist.nexus
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Good, fuck Samsung because they have been part of the cartel that has been blatantly increasing prices slowly over the years and then joined the AI slop fest and increased prices exponentially and they show no signs of reducing prices to make tech that’s using their chips more affordable so again fuck Samsung and let’s open the floodgates and start the chipocalypse!

    • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Cool scheme the US got there. If only they hadn’t destroyed most of the soft power they had created for over half a century, we might have played along.

      • Buffalox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        20 hours ago

        USA is not an ally anymore, so not much need to sacrifice our own economy just to please them.
        They won’t come to our aid if we need it, we can see that already with Ukraine.

    • forks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      21 hours ago

      former Samsung engineer

      It’s a guy who supposedly took a bribe to transfer secrets to CXMT, not a CXMT engineer

      • Buffalox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        21 hours ago

        Thanks that is true, I have read the article now, but it doesn’t make the story more trustworthy at all IMO.
        It still reeks very badly.
        How would he know that that was the plan from the beginning and how much it helped CXMT?
        This reeks of an effort to block Chinese chips.
        First we won’t sell chips to China, and now they probably try to prevent us from buying chips from China.
        This sounds so staged. Also remember South Korea had a bit of a stock market crisis in part because RAM stock dropped.

        The leaked process recipe allowed CXMT to shave off decades from its manufacturing process

        This is 100% a lie.

        CXMT managed to mass produce DDR4 memory on a 22nm node in 2019

        SMIC introduced 14nm that year, with 22nm being their old process, so it sounds more like CXMT got their process from SMIC.

        if ITC rules that CXMT relied on misappropriated trade secrets. ITC could issue a blanket ban blocking those products from entering the U.S market.

        Just as I suspected even before having read the article.

    • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Doesn’t make financial sense to start exporting at this point when they need RAM at home for their AI and computers.

      If they do start selling abroad, it’ll probably be comparable price to the big 3 since they also want profit, unless they manage to get enough volume going to just strangle the big 3, sell RAM for much less than it costs to make and then ramp up the prices when there’s no competition anymore.

      • mumblerfish@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Could it make strategic sense? As in if they do export consumer grade ram, they could encourage more llm selfhosting, and as the approach from qwen and deepseek appears to be to release quite advanced models as open (from what I have read) they could potentially undermine large ai firms not open sourcing their models. Just a thought

        • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          20 hours ago

          Well then they also lose potential customers who’d pay for their own hosted variants. Not sure anyone wants that.

  • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Cool. We need the chips.

    Besides, no corporation seeks doing it the hard way if they can copy, reverse engineer, etc. from its competitors. I’ve worked for several corporations that had a Competitive Intelligence departments whose job was to acquire competitors’ products, disassemble, catalog parts, reverse engineer the interesting bits so they could make recommendations for what to copy in their own products.

    • CorneliusTalmadge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Not only do companies do this themselves. But it’s an entire industry in itself of businesses that do this as a service.

      They then charge ridiculous prices for you to search through the data to find parts you are looking for. But it’s actually quite useful and saves a bunch of time hunting and breaking things apart.

  • devaly@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    amazing, if they don’t want to produce more chips, then others should be able to.