TIL

I’m not going to go back to a closed-source centralized platform

Where can you get a 2TB SSD for $85? Most 2TB SSD’s I’ve seen cost about €120 with the cheapest going down to €98.

None of those Rust implementations are fully functional yet, so Luanti seems like a better choice if you want something fast.

Mob behaviour and redstone are not handled by the clients, nor are they implemented by many of these servers. Those behaviors are currently missing.

Yes, it influences mob spawns

I never understood why they added that

There seems to be less activity on the Android repo. I still have like 13 unreviewed PR’s open from last year.

You can use Tailscale, you can access your personal services with it but also expose public services with their Funnels system.

Keep in mind that while the clients are open source, their servers are running proprietary software.

Maybe they should make the results public so the press can report on it when someone shows up drunk

I would like to use BTRFS for deduplication, CoW, and snapshots.

No, I’m aware of BTRFS’s RAID 5/6 issues, this would use mdadm’s RAID with BTRFS on the bcache block device.

How do you know? Do you just remember that?

I usually pick Rust for CLI tools because:

1. It’s statically compiled and isn’t dependent on system binaries and won’t break if there if the system has the wrong version like C/C++, allowing you to distribute it as a single binary without any other installation steps
2. Still produces fairly small binaries unlike languages like Java or C# (because of the VM)
3. Is a modern language with a good build system (It’s like night and day compared to CMake)
4. And I just like how the language works (errors as values etc.)

But why? It’s job is to install software, why make it worse by supporting less package formats?

They did disclose it to Google before, and got a bounty but it seems the moderators from YouTube didn’t get the memo

Here’s a POC of the exploit in action:

This video has been removed for violating the YouTube TOS

To reiterate, GNIS and GNS are only relevant to an appropriately qualified official_name tag, not a name tag, because of the on the ground rule. For this kind of feature, common sense would place a lot of weight on overall common usage, since sending someone to survey the facts “on the ground” would be… difficult.

Yeah that certainly seems difficult

That depends on if you ask the online app (which will cut you off or give you a CCP sanctioned answer) or run it locally (which seems to give a normal answer)

It was kind of pointless, but at least it made software work with custom default branches.