The catarrhine who invented a perpetual motion machine, by dreaming at night and devouring its own dreams through the day.
The meaning kind of clicked to me the first time I’ve seen the word and tried to pronounce it - it ended as [ẽ.'ʒĩ 'ʃis], the first part is close enough to English [ˈɛnd͡ʒɪn] ⟨engine⟩ that the association was obvious. ([ʃis] is just the Portuguese name for ⟨X⟩.)
I know that URL.
If we (people in general) do it, we’re being filthy thieves and the reason why everything is bad. But when it’s a megacorpo, it’s suddenly a-OK?
Screw this shit. Information should be like the air, free for everyone. Not free for the GAFAM chaste and paid for us untouchables.
No, I only saw it after I solved the problem.
Initially I simplified the problem to one prisoner. The best way to reduce uncertainty was to split the bottles into two sets with 500 bottles each; the prisoner drinks from one, if he dies the poisonous wine is there, otherwise it’s in one of the leftover 500 bottles.
Then I added in a second prisoner. The problem doesn’t give me enough time to wait for the first prisoner to die, to know which set had the poisonous wine; so I had to have the second prisoner drinking at the same time as the first, from a partially overlapping set. This means splitting the bottles into four sets instead - “both drink”, “#1 drinks it”, “#2 drinks it”, “neither drinks it”.
Extending this reasoning further to 10 prisoners, I’d have 2¹⁰=1024 sets. That’s enough to uniquely identify which bottle has poison. Then the binary part is just about keeping track of who drinks what.
Number all bottles in binary, starting from 0000000000. Then the Nth prisoner drinks all wines where the Nth digit is “1”. have each prisoner drinking the wines where a certain digit is “1”.
So for example. If you had 8 bottles and 3 prisoners (exact same logic):
If nobody dies the poisoned wine is numbered 000. And if all die it’s the 111.
Piracy is morally justified when 1 is a more pressing matter than 2. As such, it’s justified in situations like this:
I ended picking Miru (from another comment) up to watch anime, so I won’t automatise the system - I’ll use the RSS just to warn me when there are new episodes. That said, this extension (to allow transmission to download from rss) plus this site (to sift the RSS feed, so you don’t download e.g. individual episodes alongside batches) could help.
I liked it. I really liked it.
It got a .deb version, not just appimage. Installed without issues.
The interface is clean, and I could easily find series that I enjoy, both on- and off-season. (Tested with DanMachi V and Hikaru no Go). For neither it felt like I was watching it from torrents, there was no stuttering at all.
I use MAL instead of AL, but importing the list was easy enough. It’s less one thing to do, great - now I don’t need to update the anime list manually!
Going to test this later, thank you!
I just tested this now. This is brilliant, thank you for the idea! I wasn’t even aware that the torrent site could generate RSS for search queries!
For now I’m simply following those RSS feeds through liferea, but later on I might even automate it further.
Like others I’ve seen been torrenting my episodes instead, but man… I miss the convenience.
Don’t get me wrong - torrents are great, but for me they’re the best when I want to binge watch a complete series and/or keep it indefinitely. I’m typically following ~10 series/season = episodes/week; I need to find the series in a certain torrent site, then download it, watch it, seed it… it’s a bit of a bother, you know.
Additional opinion: piracy is always morally good if the reason for your piracy is inability to buy something. That includes when the item is delisted, as in the OP, but also when you can’t afford it.
[I agree with the OP by the way. Specificities should be ironed out, but in spirit it would be a good law.]
I don’t think that this is unpopular, even if I agree with you. Not even in real life; often those in power try to associate work with positive things, and yet the actual workers see it as a mockery.
Cue to the Latin word tripalium (a torture device) ending as the word for “work” in plenty Romance languages; or to the Nazi “Arbeit macht Frei” (work makes freedom) on concentration camps.
If by “a little toxicity” you mean a little bit of aggressiveness, sarcasm, etc., I agree with you. It depends a lot on the community though - in some, allowing it will be counter-productive.
If however you mean harassment and hate speech, as the author of the text, I strongly disagree. If the mod doesn’t curb down those things, they might not be “lording” over the discourse, but other users are - because
Another detail is that you don’t need to control the discourse to curb down harassment, since it’s only behavioural and not discursive in nature.
So IMO when it comes to those two things the problem is not overzealous mods, but dumb ones not doing due diligence, who are a bit too eager to falsely accuse their own users to be voicing hate speech or harassing each other when it is not the case.
[Sorry for the wall of text.]
You’re reading too much into my “look it up”. It was basically “I’m not wasting my time with your rhetorical question”.
I’m aware of what you’re explaining (semantic drift + polysemy), however neither is relevant here.
Wtf is “hate speech”?
Look it up.
To call hate speech and harassment “toxicity” downplays both issues.
Optimists cause more harm than good.
Correctly highlight when a programmer is being assumptive as a brick, even when assumptions are one of the biggest sins in programming. Done, you’ve triggered a lot of programmers.