

Laws are stupid because people break them
Yes! No laws! Everything should be legal!!!1


Laws are stupid because people break them
Yes! No laws! Everything should be legal!!!1


Are there non-gay bars on Castro st? Never been to SF but all I know is that’s like the most iconic/historic gay district


Sorry sir, are you an expert on how information is shared? How about modern learning theory? If you aren’t a master of both, you should remove yourself from this discussion
/s


My extensive knowledge of Soviet film theory means nothing to current Oscar discussions.
OP is an idiot. And Dziga Vertov would agree with me


The dotcom bubble burst. We still use the internet
To clarify, your article specifies that Ring only shares footage with explicit consent. Don’t share your footage publicly online, people


Am I being trolled or do people not know how years work


Oh boy. I just reread your edited comments. It’s hard to keep up when you shirt like that
But yes, I would still care to hear your 40s and 50s examples. If you have one where overture+credits approaches 10 minutes, I’d be shocked. As we’ve discussed, some examples in the 60s can hit 5 minutes, but that’s about the most I’ve seen


Which Lawrence of Arabia version from the 40s or 50s (your words) are you referring to?
If you mean the famous 60s film…. Yes, it has a minute of credits and another 4 or 5 for the overture. Not credits.
Again, still looking for examples of extended credit sequences. Overtures are basically the same as intermissions. That’s a totally different beast.
Even if you want to lump them together, we’re still at the “one or two” I mentioned. Huge Hollywood blockbusters. Exceedingly rare.


Why do people keep naming 60s films with 4 minutes of musical intros when I’m asking for 40s and 50s films with 10 minute credit intros lol?
Edit: overture is the word I was looking for, not “musical intro”. But that’s not a thing that happened in early cinema (barring Chaplin, who had strict control of scores - would be interested if someone else cares to google that)


4 minutes. That’s a great example of the rare symphonic opening I was referencing.
But that’s also not the 40s or 50s.


Please name one. Never seen one that had more than 2 minutes of opening credit even if you include the extra symphonic stuff as “credits” (we don’t count previews toward runtimes now, so not sure it’s a fair comparison). Maybe one or two had a dedicated symphonic opening but that was exceedingly rare


The Truffaut film referenced is an hour and 45 minutes.
What movie had 10 minutes of opening credits? Back when credits were at the open, it used to be about 30 seconds of credits.


Uhhhh, really?


Shitty journals take shitty articles that are poorly cited
Okay, I think we knew that part. The fact that people know it and use AI to abuse the shitty publications shouldn’t be a surprise. This article basically says “if you see an article without citations, it’s likely AI”. Cool.
For the record, real science includes citations. I work in a field roughly tangential to this and you’d be shocked at the man hours that go into citations. Only crap articles would skip that.


So because some people with a title are bad, you shouldn’t trust anyone with that title?
So we shouldn’t trust anyone, essentially?
One doctor abused their patients, so doctors are bad.
One (okay lol, I know) priest raped kids, so all priests are bad.
Someone with your title did [insert crime here], so you are bad.


Politics on Nextdoor? Yeah, that’s cringe. It’s for lost dogs and shit, dude
Even if you say “hating ICE isn’t politics,” making blanket statements about hating all your neighbors isn’t what Nextdoor is for


This “unpopular opinion” is literally just “I wish the Brits won”
Op thinks slo mo shots of champagne makes something art?
Sure but I’m asking if, in the most famous gay street in the US, there are bars that are not “gay bars”