Thank you.

I fixed it.

Who the fuck prints stuff on paper in 2026/2027.

Check this article.

Fuck Euronews. They are a terrible news source for Europe news.

I am downvoting this shit.

I understand.

Yes.

Original source with no commentary.

Actually, no.

Not at all:

The AI infrastructure buildout is entering a new phase: Tech companies are doubling down on AI.

Graph Source: Bloomberg.

US tech companies are committing to spend a record $850 billion on data center leases over the next several years.

This marks a +$570 billion YoY increase, or +204%, and +$200 billion QoQ increase, or +31%.

Meta, $META, added the most in Q1 2026, committing +$79 billion in new leases, a +76% QoQ increase, bringing its total to ~$183 billion.

At the same time, Microsoft, $MSFT, added +$41 billion, a +26% QoQ increase, bringing its total to ~$197 billion.

Oracle leads with the largest total commitments at ~$250 billion, having already secured many of the key sites needed to fulfill its contract with OpenAI.

Source: The Kobeissi Letter.

I just want to say… what the fuckkkkkk.

Shit has gotten hot so quickly in the AI space in the last 6 months.

No, I am Beep.

Sigh

The UBS Report, that the whole article appears to be based on.

I don’t know why the Guardian had choosen to get this sloppy with this article.

For the OP who posted this article here, this article doesn’t seem even related to technology.

I don’t know what to say.

The article that he posted have bad title and is written by bad news outlet(Futurism),IMO.

The article that is referenced as the source in Futurism.

The actual title: Google caps Meta’s Gemini use as AI demand strains capacity.

Down-voted due to bad source(Futurism) and bad title.

Nope😊

Good point, but what is the alternative?

I don’t get what is your point/ counterpoint here.

My statement that you quoted specifically states opinion and mentions an example.

What you are talking about in your server is literally not something mentioned at all in my whole post.

Yet after you talked about your server you returned to talk about the memes community without offering anything there.

What is your point exactly?

AI art had won awards.

In theory, nothing is preventing AI art from being high or low quality.

Which simply voids the comment/Opinion I am replying to.

Which means both AI and human artists can create high quality or bad quality art.

So the question now, if you saw high quality piece of art that you suspect it’s created by AI, will you focus on the quality or the creation process?

I am confused.

Your comment seems to be againest my opinion, yet your logic seems to support me.

If AI created a low quality art, then it’s a low quality art. The creation proccess didn’t matter in your opinion about the art piece.

🙄No.

Talk in reason, instead of whatever you are doing for the benefit of no one.