• 2 Posts
  • 17 Comments
Joined 3 days ago
cake
Cake day: October 31st, 2026

help-circle













  • Depends what your interests are! I can get around 35ish tok/s TG at - c 48,000 of Qwen 3.6-35B-A3B (Q4_K_M) using polystrata on a similar rig (you’ve got an A1000, I have a T1000).

    Which means absolutely nothing to you right now but suffice to say - Polystrata + Qwen 35B is something to try. It’s among the “smartest” you can run on your rig.

    Personally, for every day use, I like Ling 3.0 Tiny at Q6 or SharpMiniCPM5-2B at Q8. They are stupidly fast, and supported by MCP tools and a bridge I wrote, work as excellent “hey, I’m thinking of X. Can you tell me about it? And what about Y and Z?” or “How does this read?”

    Think of it like a Google in your pocket, except off line (unless you tell it to go online). Which technically I suppose makes it agentic lol.

    (I can show you some examples if you’d like. I keep a set list of 8 tasks I use for benchmarking as I tweak things, as well as some off the wall / out of band queries)

    Being that Ling or CPM only take up a sliver of the GPU, I can run them concurrently with other models (like an image generator, text to speech, vision etc) to create a really useful offline house brain, that can roam across my local documents, offline wikipedia (Kiwix) and the like.

    It’s the combination of things that results in a 1+1=3

    Having said that, my AI ladder is

    • 90% Ling or minicpm5
    • 9% Qwen 3.6-35B
    • 1% GLM5.3 Flash via open router… which costs fractions of a cent for what I need (there are tricks to this but it’s probably out of scope to info dump it on you at this stage).

    For now, I keep a $20 ChatGPT Plus (separate pools for chat and Codex have been so good) but I am ditching that asap, with the changes coming this month.

    HTH. Write back if you need anything else. It’s nice to see someone else rocking an A1000 / T1000. Your rig should be significantly faster than mine… which is why the A1000 is still stupidly expensive for a 50W card.






  • They are the way to go, but hardware pricing makes it cost-prohibitive to match frontier capabilities, which makes decomp and recomp difficult. Or rather, they require more skill and take longer, introducing some barriers against the current floodgates being flung open.

    We all know the eye-watering prices GPUs and RAM cost now, to say nothing of Unified Memory devices like the Strix. Most people just don’t have a spare $10K to throw at an inference box that can run (say) a 300B model at interactive (not batch) speeds.

    Coming at this from another angle tho, I note that according to Steam stats, the most popular consumer GPUs are in the 8GB and 16GB range…which is smack bang in the VRAM range of what a good MoE (say, Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B) runs on (for 8GB) or arguably the best local dense coder (Qwen 3.8 27B) can live at. Which leaves us with a capable assistant and a capable coder.

    I think there’s probably room for LLM improvement in the 8–16GB range too…and given that most consumer PCs and laptops live there, I’m sanguine the open-weight devs might make it happen.

    But I also suspect the gatekeeping of high-end capacities is intentional.

    We’re probably not going to have the ability to vibe code Mario into Elden Ring again…not without significantly more skill. Dunno.