Perhaps it’s not exactly equivalent since this is an LLM, but from what I’ve learnt in my undergrad machine learning course, shouldn’t the test data be separate from the training data?

The train-test (or train-validate-test) split was one of the first few things we learnt to do.

Otherwise, the model can easily get a 100% accuracy (or whatever relevant metric) simply by regurgitating training data, which looks like the case here.

I’m not sure what you are getting at.

Then saying that you have looked through and reviewed the code would be lying. And that is unprofessional.

Maybe remind them that all of their upvotes and downvotes are public.

It’s possible to see what others upvoted or downvoted?

OpenAI CloseAI

So, fight club but on the internet.

Any context?

Since we are on the topic of funny stuff in code, here’s one encounter I had earlier:

default variables to null or something

That is such a bad idea. Better to have the compiler warn you about it like in Rust, or have the linter / IDE highlight it.

Yeah, TIL too.

I just searched for an image of “pouring water on computer”.

Gundam: The Witch from Mercury