fedii.me
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
sanitation@lemmy.today to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 8 days ago

Woman Calls Out Doctor Wearing Smart Glasses During Consultation Where She Had To Take Off Her Clothes: 'They Need To Be Banned'

www.fashiontimes.co.uk

external-link
message-square
130
link
fedilink
0
external-link

Woman Calls Out Doctor Wearing Smart Glasses During Consultation Where She Had To Take Off Her Clothes: 'They Need To Be Banned'

www.fashiontimes.co.uk

sanitation@lemmy.today to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 8 days ago
message-square
130
link
fedilink
A woman's discomfort with a doctor wearing smart glasses during a consultation has sparked debate over privacy and the use of camera-equipped technology in healthcare settings.
  • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    I can honestly put up with a lot, especially in a doctor’s office. Hell it’s the only place I’m okay with something up my ass. I would walk out if my doctor came in with those glasses. I will go and find a new doctor. There is no way I am okay with a personal camera in that exam room.

    • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      I will go and find a new doctor.

      right after I punch Dr. M. Olester in the face.

      • PRIMEcavitationfetishist@quokk.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        Seriously. How many patients did this guy record before someone noticed? He needs to be killed. Sloppers can’t communicate anymore-they just ask grok what that meant and Claude how to win the argument. Language now skips the human and is entirely mediated by corporate machines. the only thing left is violence.

    • joe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      I totally get what you’re saying.

      However, it is kind of funny (interesting?) that people will trust that there isn’t a hidden camera in the exam room without question, but mistrust someone who has a camera openly displayed, but off, in the exam room. As if the reminder that cameras exist is what negates that trust, not the risk of being recorded.

      This is more of a philosophical musing than a defense of wearing a camera into an exam room.

      • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        but off,

        there’s an entire creepy industry to disable the lights.

        https://stealthspecs.com/product/send-in-modification-service-disable-led-on-meta-glasses/

        https://www.reddit.com/r/RayBanStories/comments/s9bb2i/blocking_led_light_when_recording/

        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=awCU4RtorMY

        https://cybernews.com/ai-news/meta-ai-glasses-record-without-warning-light/

        • LilBobbyTables@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 days ago

          Yeh I know, so clearly that way of doing it isn’t sufficient.

          • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 days ago

            ?

            not sure what you’re saying; there’s multiple different bypasses. as long as creeps can record what they see without someone’s consent to be recorded, they’ll be creep glasses.

            • LilBobbyTables@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 days ago

              So much the same as phones? Are phones “creep phones”?

              There are multiple ways to prevent this, they just haven’t implemented any of them yet because the pushback hasn’t been loud enough, nor has anything been legislated.

              • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                6 days ago

                PHONES DON’T RECORD WHERE YOU LOOK.

                Phones are visible! they don’t look like spectacles. Why do I have to explain this?

                I suspect you’re just being duplicitous, certainly you’ve never tried to put your phone on your face or answer the glasses when you hear a ringtone.

                Stop acting stupid.

                • LilBobbyTables@lemmy.today
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  6 days ago

                  Now you’re trying to make a distinction between recording and recording exactly from your PoV? Why? Why does that make any difference?

                  Glasses are visible, and what I’ve been saying is that there just needs to be legislation and standards around making it obvious when smart glasses are recording.

                  • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    5 days ago

                    sure thing creep

    • Boomer Humor Doomergod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      It’s not even a personal camera. The footage is uploaded to Facebook where they have humans categorize and tag it.

      • mannycalavera@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        [bums], [boobs], [other]

        • kambusha@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 days ago

          [Hot dog] [Not hot dog]

          • green_goglin@thelemmy.club
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 days ago

Technology@lemmy.world

technology@lemmy.world

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


  • @[email protected]
  • @[email protected]
  • @[email protected]
  • @[email protected]
Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 592 users / day
  • 1.89K users / week
  • 2.13K users / month
  • 2.2K users / 6 months
  • 0 local subscribers
  • 87.4K subscribers
  • 401 Posts
  • 5.69K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • L3s@lemmy.world
  • enu@lemmy.world
  • Technopagan@lemmy.world
  • L4sBot@lemmy.worldB
  • BE: 0.19.20
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org