• eicker@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Nobody’s asking us to bet on miracle batteries: Wind and solar paired with storage are already cheaper than building new nuclear. Reusing a coal plant’s grid connection doesn’t magically make a reactor cheap or quick to build. If speed and CO2 matter, follow the numbers, not the nostalgia.

    • gian @lemmy.grys.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Maybe cheaper in money terms, not others, first of all space.
      But how much would cost to build a solar farm with the same output of a nuclear plant, both on days and night ?

      • knatschus@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        12 hours ago

        There are a bunch of studies about that, the point of all those articles like this one coming out recently is that solar has become so cheap it even beats nuclear when you factor in the still very high cost of storing the power