The whole furry thing is creepy as hell. It’s weird. Wanting to have sex with anthropomorphized animals is not a thing that should be normalized.

And it’s even creepier when they add things like “kitten” or showing anthropomorphized animal kids.

And thank you to Unruffled [they/them] / Flatworm7591 @lemmy.dbzer0.com for this sane and reasonable response.

And thanks to recursive_recursion who seems to be an alt of Flatworm for continuing that sane and reasonable response. Note that in over 1,400 comments here I’ve never once said a single word against trans people. Not once.

It really bothers me when people lie about racism. So many people really do experience it so much in life, and lying using false racism accusations as a sword and shield to make other people look bad and make themselves look like the victim is demeaning to every real instance people suffer.

Hopefully one day this person realizes that lying about transphobia for the same reasons does the same thing.

  • Aberration13@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    The costumes(with some exceptions) are just costumes though, not everyone who has a fursuit is even into the kinky stuff, you seem to be making a lot of assumptions and generalizations. It’s not all sexual.

    If anything you might be the one oversexualizing here

    • velma@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      How do you tell if someone wearing a fur suit is into the kinky stuff or not? I can’t tell out in public personally.

      I’m asking sincerely as I don’t mind furries generally. To each their own and all that! But I do mind when people are involving others in their kink without consent.

      • Aberration13@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        Same way you go around assuming most people aren’t wearing vibrators and butt plugs in public, because some definitely do but it’s probably best not to make negative assumptions about people.

        Personally though I don’t even mind if people do kink in public so long as on a functional level it’s not noticeable or at risk of making others uncomfortable.

        • velma@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 days ago

          Mm that’s a good point on the wearable sex toys. I’ll make negative assumptions about people wearing those and knowingly involving non-consenting people in the kink though. Even if the other people are unaware. That’s creepy and borders on rape-like tendencies.

          • Trump Rapes Kids@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 days ago

            It’s directly involving non consenting, unaware, people in their sexual fetish. It’s definitely creepy and not okay.

            • Aberration13@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 days ago

              So does masturbation usually. I think you need a more detailed explanation of what actually makes a thing wrong and where that line is.

              • Trump Rapes Kids@lemmy.worldOP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                8 days ago

                No, it doesn’t. There’s a huge distinction between the natural human act of masturbation possibly imagining a person in your head but not involving them in any way in reality, and secretly masturbating while sitting next to others in public and very literally involving them in your fetish.

                • Aberration13@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  8 days ago

                  On a physical level sure, but on a moral level I’d be interested to hear your reasoning. I don’t even really have a horse in this race since it’s not something I do or have any interest in doing but it seems pretty obvious that this doesn’t really harm anyone, you’re not forcing anyone to do anything, you’re not doing anything TO anyone, and unless they take your clothes off they won’t know,

                  masturbation: getting off while thinking about someone in another room this:getting off while thinking about someone in the same room

                  if the only difference is proximity then what even is your argument considering proximity has no moral dimension?

                  • Trump Rapes Kids@lemmy.worldOP
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    7 days ago

                    Not all people are even capable of seeing a mental image of another person, it’s not a real thing but an aspect of the mind and memory. It is by it’s very nature completely different from physically involving another person in your fetish without their knowledge or consent.

            • velma@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 days ago

              Yeah that’s the line for me with any kink or fetish. You can’t involve others without their consent and still be morally correct.

              • Aberration13@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                8 days ago

                I don’t think this actually is the line though, take masturbation for example, most folk masturbate to other people they know, technically this is involving others in a sexual way without consent but it’s considered completely ok and normal because ultimately you’re not doing anything TO them.

                Same with wearing a buttplug in public, is it kinda strange? Yeah, sure, you can even say it’s offputting and I would at least in some cases agree, but on a moral level you’re not doing anything TO anyone, that’s in my eyes the real line, if they don’t know and have no way of knowing then it’s not really causing harm.

                Compare it to say flashing strangers in public, now you’re doing something TO people, without consent and that is bad.

                • velma@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  8 days ago

                  Hmm I like your point about masturbation. To narrow in on where my personal line is: the physically present part. I do think if one is wearing a sex toy in public with the purpose of getting the thrill of interacting with people without consent it isn’t morally ok. Intention matters.

                  Now that I know fur suits that people wear in public are not used sexually (or at least that’s what I’ve been told here), my opinion on the public suit wearing has shifted a little to a more positive one.

                  I know there’s an argument in there that what people don’t know won’t hurt them, but I disagree. It hurts the offender as well as the subjects when leaning into enjoying using people without consent.

    • Trump Rapes Kids@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      Right. I’m the one over sexualizing the anthropomorphized animals people post blatantly sexual pictures of all over the internet. My mistake.

      • Aberration13@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        I’m not denying SOME of it is sexual, but what you’re doing is assuming that MOST or ALL of it is sexual, which is both wrong and also the result of cognitive biases and a good example of why extrapolation from anecdotes is a bad idea especially when it’s fueled by confirmation bias

        • Trump Rapes Kids@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 days ago

          The Internet is full of those sexualized pictures. The pictures came before the suits were something most people could easily buy.

          The sexualization started before people started wearing them in public for other things. The only reason the response wasn’t people freaking out was most didn’t know that and kids just see cute animal mascots.

          It still seems like forcing the public to participate in a fetish without consent.

            • Trump Rapes Kids@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 days ago

              I have no idea what you’re talking about, that doesn’t seem like a response to the comment you responded to. It’s definitely not me saying how you got interested in anything.