return2ozma@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 9 天前People are asking ChatGPT to help them decide how to vote in the midtermswww.npr.orgexternal-linkmessage-square55linkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkPeople are asking ChatGPT to help them decide how to vote in the midtermswww.npr.orgreturn2ozma@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 9 天前message-square55linkfedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squaregrapefruittrouble@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·9 天前Is this not what it was designed for?
minus-squareWhoIzDisIz@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·9 天前Not with the monied interests in charge of its operation. They want people to depend upon the big AIs for answers to everything so they can subtly guide the populace’s “thinking” and control them like the sheep most of them are.
minus-squareLeon@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·9 天前Yes, that’s what the comment was saying.
minus-squareWhoIzDisIz@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·9 天前Could be interpreted either way, I suppose - it was extremely vague.
minus-squareZomg@piefed.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·9 天前When the companies can adjust the weights and responses to be more soft or critical to topics, you can’t exactly trust that it isn’t unbias some how.
minus-squareTubularTittyFrog@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·8 天前you can click through to the source material when it’s linked. but nobody is doing that, and when I admit to doing it people tell me I’m deranged.
Is this not what it was designed for?
Not with the monied interests in charge of its operation. They want people to depend upon the big AIs for answers to everything so they can subtly guide the populace’s “thinking” and control them like the sheep most of them are.
Yes, that’s what the comment was saying.
Could be interpreted either way, I suppose - it was extremely vague.
I did mean it that way haha
When the companies can adjust the weights and responses to be more soft or critical to topics, you can’t exactly trust that it isn’t unbias some how.
you can click through to the source material when it’s linked.
but nobody is doing that, and when I admit to doing it people tell me I’m deranged.