I’ve started calling this domain human reserved. I like the phrase human reserved because it makes me think of nature reserves – places where we could put buildings and roads, but we choose not to because the loss would be too great.
they’ll propose anything but socialism
Don’t worry Bill, world war 3 will wipe everyone out before that happens.
Oh go wet yourself on a poxy tart, Bill. Nobody gives a shit what you think.
Is he talking about Russian prostitutes to cheat on his wife with?
Go away, Bill. Take your ill-gotten gains and retire into obscurity. It’ll save your life.
This is just another DEI plan. I’m all for it. But it fails in practice.
Let‘s construct a data center in each and every backyard of this fucker‘s properties and let‘s hear what he has to say about AI then.
Per the article, he’s talking about doctors.
Mandatory Spies Like Us scene https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hoe24aSvLtw
epstein associate making noise to distract from epstein relationship-GATES.
It was obvious and proven already a few years ago:
CEOs are the first and most easy ones to replace by AI.
Why give them pointless jobs? Just give them the money.
Agreed that’s trying to preserve the workaround, without fixing the problem.
Problem is it doesn’t matter, the reality is, demand for jobs, and people who need to survive… isn’t a number guaranteed to match, and between automation, and wages falling so far behind inflation that many households need 2+ incomes just to keep the lights on, an unemployment problem is inevitable.
If AI actually can cut enough jobs, that the number of jobs available, is less than the number of people who WANT to work, then all we need to do is make it so people don’t HAVE to work.
If AI actually can cut enough jobs
Anyone who has used one of these knows that it can’t. It’s all a scheme to defraud investors.
I mean, it has cut jobs already… and replaced human talent with cheap slop.
It can make “art”. That art sucks, and is obvious where it’s used. Everyone hates the AI ads.
It can make “music”. Wouldn’t be surprised if it’s being used in places some people haven’t noticed, but probably ads or something where we tune out.
It replaced a lot of jobs that used to have human customer service reps… Shitty jobs that are soul sucking, but also jobs that paid people’s rent. And the customer service sucks more now, even worse than someone who’s
But the lie the investors bought was that it’d replace human labor. And less so, it’s the new “industrial age”. Nah. It’s like the industrial age in some respects, but for small sectors of labor where you don’t give a shit that the product is worse.
I feel like people make this weird mistake inspired by scifi that, if a tech becomes possible, it automatically fulfills some sci-fi prophecies about changing humanity. I think we keep making this mistake, and end up realizing well maybe it’s a bit more complicated, maybe there’s a cost we didn’t see, maybe there’s fundamental limits to its potential we didn’t see.
Just because you make a chatbot that can code doesn’t mean it can improve its own code exponentially. It just hasn’t, and not for the lack of their trying.
I mean, it has cut jobs already…
It didn’t. Again, companies are cutting jobs to appease investors and make it look that way.
“Would you like fries with that?”
-Human brings out the fries-
We’re still quoting this fucker after his Epstein emails?
I was hating on him when he was just a monopolist.
I’d prefer not, but he’s not wrong.
Very related to the premise of Job Simulator, where AI feels bad for bored humans so creates a museum where they can experience work.
Hes talking about keeping human execs and CEOs. Because fuck the plebs. And in his case fuck the young plebs.
The way CEOs blindly follow trends and lie compulsively, they’d be perfectly replaced by LLMs.
