spoiler
When I say LLMs I always mean opensource, openweight models not OpenAI/Anthropic/X-AI crap, these companies are trying their darndest to spread misinformation and lobby to quell and prevent the development of these opensource models, they should be punished by creating an alternate ecosystem untouched by the opinions and whims of these feudalistic tech lords
The exam/criteria should be broad and rigorous, The license issued and the exam should be private(tied to a handle not PI name), unique and publicly verifiable.
Right now the onus is on individual projects to take a stance for/against LLM use for any contributions in their codebase.
With all the opinions floating around regarding LLM use for programming(most of which i feel is either misinformation, or technophobia), I think this would at least stem some of the legitimate concerns regarding competency and responsibility.
Don’t you have something better to do with your life than spam obscure corners of the internet with your aggresively ignorant opinon on this subject? You have no expertise or experience in the matter, why are you so confident in your opinion on it?
Idealists believe that ideas shape reality, so they fake confidence to try convincing others that whatever they want is already real.
According to idealism, the thing they want is then supposed to magically appear when enough people believe it to be real.
And when that inevitably doesn’t work, they blame the people that called them out on their fake claims, for not believing hard enough.