spoiler
When I say LLMs I always mean opensource, openweight models not OpenAI/Anthropic/X-AI crap, these companies are trying their darndest to spread misinformation and lobby to quell and prevent the development of these opensource models, they should be punished by creating an alternate ecosystem untouched by the opinions and whims of these feudalistic tech lords
The exam/criteria should be broad and rigorous, The license issued and the exam should be private(tied to a handle not PI name), unique and publicly verifiable.
Right now the onus is on individual projects to take a stance for/against LLM use for any contributions in their codebase.
With all the opinions floating around regarding LLM use for programming(most of which i feel is either misinformation, or technophobia), I think this would at least stem some of the legitimate concerns regarding competency and responsibility.
Great idea. Bureaucracy and reducing human ability to a single score is always the right process for assuring quality.
Hey, if we don’t democratize the ability to get that single score some corporate will start charging money to do it and in a few years that will become the standard
democratize
🤣
I always mean opensource, openweight models not OpenAI/Anthropic/X-AI crap
Honest question: is it even possible to separate oneself completely from AI’s multifaceted exploitation by using “FOSS AI”?
And if yes, does such ethically acceptable “FOSS AI” exist?
If you’re competent, you don’t use LLMs.
So I don’t see the purpose.
Don’t you have something better to do with your life than spam obscure corners of the internet with your aggresively ignorant opinon on this subject? You have no expertise or experience in the matter, why are you so confident in your opinion on it?
Idealists believe that ideas shape reality, so they fake confidence to try convincing others that whatever they want is already real.
According to idealism, the thing they want is then supposed to magically appear when enough people believe it to be real.
And when that inevitably doesn’t work, they blame the people that called them out on their fake claims, for not believing hard enough.
Maybe a year ago. Not today.
What is the problem that this would solve?
drown out the slop. If a slop kiddie makes a 600+ diff PR, you can safely ignore it, but if a license holder makes a PR you consider it.
who is funding this? who gets to decide? the real.issue is, there has always been slop submissions but the barrier of entry wa shigh so few people in civilization had the skill and fewer even attempted to submit. now every si gle person alive can submit. its not an anti llm stance uts “how do i manage this side gig i dont get paid for” stance
