The link has a ton of information.

Under Privacy Settings, there are options for Device Usage Data, Collect App and Over-the-Air Usage, and Interest-Based Ads. All are enabled by default, but you can disable them.

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    14 minutes ago

    Disable those non connected options

    You don’t really believe that companies actually stop monitoring the shot out of you, right?

    Just don’t connect your smart TV to the Internet. Instead get some opens source TV stick, dump jellyfin on it, make your own little library and go nuts

    • Squizzy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      44 minutes ago

      Not done, they have shown to jump on unsecured networks to phone home. That coulr be a neighbour or a guests hotspot.

      • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        13 minutes ago

        Welk then at least they’re monitoring the neighbors, not you, and if you still have an unsecured hotspot in 2026 you’re just asking for trouble

      • Synapse@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Where can you buy a non-smart TV ? I searched a lot, there is nowhere to buy such TV for private consumers. I could find some Hotel or Hospital TVs on eBay, they are all expensive and shit specs.

        • blackbeans@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 hour ago

          There are several dumb tvs, such as the Samsung BEFX-H series and the LG UN640S. Yes, they are more expensive for the same specs, because they don’t make money with ads and paid services.

        • MeatPilot@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          This is the reason I have a 20+ year old plasma TV. Absolutely nothing smart and still somewhat thin. Also the picture is sometimes better for movies because of how it handles blacks and contrast.

          Burns more electricity I guess. But most plasmas should be around the time of the flat TV crazy started before LED took off. Before they started making them cheaper by stuffing them full of spy software.

  • DupaCycki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Genuinely zero idea how people use TVs on their own, with wi-fi connected, and no HTPC. Not only is it mostly spyware, it’s a horrendous experience too.

    Just get a tiny pc with a wireless keyboard + touchpad combo, and use that instead of a Smart TV’s built-in OS. More secure, more private, more feature-rich, more convenient. If you watch TV (I can’t see why anyone would), then you can even watch that online.

    • strawberry_enjoyer42@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      I can’t stand “smart” TVs. I’d choose a Raspberry Pi and huge monitor over one any day

      Except maybe the Nvidia Shield; it’s genuinely pretty good. I have Retroarch installed on it, but I don’t use it much (no monitor for it lol).

  • Kongar@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I’ve been rocking a 46 inch Sony xbr 1080p tv for like 22 years. It just broke last week :(

    That thing was awesome. It had nine types of inputs, DisplayPort, hdmi, super video, dvi, rca. It even had optical audio in and out. It was a $10,000 tv when it came out and I watched it for a while until it was something like $3300 and I bought it.

    I replaced it with a 55inch Samsung for $300. The picture is 22years better :) but the rest of it is throw away junk. It will never get connected to the internet and it will never get a software update. I think this is the logical conclusion to cheap tvs, they just become 100% enshittified.

    • Prove_your_argument@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Is the picture really better though? All the new stuff has image processing crap due to refresh rate mismatches and loads of older content never got a HD release, let alone 4k. I’m never gonna stop watching stuff like Star Trek, and voyager looks like dogshit given it never got a release beyond DVD because of how they did the editing.

      Don’t get me wrong, I know you can modify all kinds of settings to minimize the impact of the image processing. Turning off the processing gives you a ton of problems, and enabling the processing can work in some media but doesn’t work quite right in others.

      With my home setup the difference between plex, netflix and other streaming services can be pretty big depending on the formats supported by the specific show even. It’s all a mess and if you want it to be right odds are you need to really mess with it and even then you only have so many options. Getting a new TV has not been as positive as I hoped for, but i’ve gotten used to it and just accept that some things look kinda garbage because tweaking one thing often makes one show better, but others might not be as good as a result.

      • Kongar@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Ya, I think it’s much better to be honest. I hate all the interpolation post processing crap too, but it just turn it all off. I found the old tv has a lot more light bleed from the back panel, and the newer tvs have blacker blacks and more contrast. I do think they are significant upgrades. But everything else is a major downgrade from the number of ports, the durability, the extra crap shoved down my throat, etc.

        But if you use it just like a dumb monitor, it’s a great cheap tv.

    • 9488fcea02a9@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      You should maybe connect it once for update. At least check firmware update changelogs to see if anything is relevant.

      I have an LG and experienced a weird picture problem for over a year… it was infuriating. Firmware update fixed it.

  • Zephyr@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Never connect it to your wifi and use an open source Linux or android media box instead. If you can buy a tv or projector without any smart device baked in.

        • Prove_your_argument@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          So 720p streaming and a lot of maintenance.

          I so very much want to ditch closed source but then i’m limited to piracy really, and any setup really requires hours of maintenance here and there at minimum.

          • Zephyr@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            44 minutes ago

            Hours? Running Fedora and enabling DRM on Firefox ain’t that complex, neither is installing the waydroid flatpak. I think you’re really blowing the situation out of proportion. Assuming you already have the iso probably like 30 minutes to get set up including a full install.

          • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            36 minutes ago

            So 720p streaming and a lot of maintenance.

            Video frontends like GrayJay and Revanced let you pick streaming resolution and it actually gets followed. Plus they work for multiple services like Youtube, Patreon, Nebula.

            If you’re not happy about getting 720p from Netflix in a browser, that’s from Netflix being cunts. You’re better off voting with your wallet and dropping them.

            Also, maintenance? It’s minimal. You get an update popup in the video frontend maybe once per week and wait 30 seconds after hitting “yes”. And you can add an extension on Deckyloader to autoupdate all of your software in the background each day without needing to do anything

      • Zephyr@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        You buy one from the internet, any hardware that can run Android Open Source Project (AOSP) like the Ugoos AM8 Pro, Generic Amlogic Boxes. You could use certain arm and x86 hardware and run waydroid on top of Linux or install android like LineageOS, BlissOS, PrimeOS AndroidTV-x86_64, and FydeOS. You can use like an SBC like a raspberry pi or an old laptop or something. In short there’s. A lot of pathways to get this done that doesn’t involve sending all your data back to the TV or streaming box manufacturer.

        Maybe the easiest way is just using Linux and waydroid on really any hardware. There are specified Linux OS’s like LibreELEC, OSMC (Open Source Media Center), LinuxMCE, but it’s not necessary you run a specified OS. Also easier to slap a hard drive on that badboy and get a media server going with Plex or jellyfin and host other stuff like kiwix, pinhole, nextcloud and so on. Just pair with a Bluetooth keyboard trackpad combo and you’re good to go.

    • Creat@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 hours ago

      There was some sort of scandal a few years back that some smart TVs (Samsung?) were using not just open networks (let’s be honest, there usually aren’t any), but other smart TVs if the same manufacturer to be able to send their telemetry. I don’t know what game of that, or if that was ever made illegal (probably not).

      • Feyd@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I don’t think this is real, but if it is can you provide a link? I’m not finding anything easily with a search and randomly throwing out claims like this is not productive.

            • ankanamoon@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              14 minutes ago

              I never stated it as fact, nor was it my attempt to have it come across as one. Just a rumor people have claimed.

              I could have been more clear in that in hindsight.

              • Feyd@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                49 minutes ago

                1 person posting on reddit isn’t enough for me to believe they didn’t simply misunderstand what happened. There are a lot of tech-illiterate people out there and if this was a thing I’m pretty sure we’d see people reproducing the results and posting procedures to do so.

                • ZeroHora@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  29 minutes ago

                  Yeah I also don’t think this hold much water, even if the TV automatically connect to the wi-fi, turn the wi-fi feature on/off automatically seems unlikely.

    • Anonymous_Leaker@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      People connect them to the internet to use YouTube or something, and then just forget that it is still online. This is for those people who are unaware. And a smart TV can still be hacked while disconnected from Wi-Fi, that is obviously harder to do.

      • artyom@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        If those people are unaware, then make them aware. Telling them to disable telemtry instead of taking them offline completely is simply bad advice.

        • Anonymous_Leaker@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          8 hours ago

          Turning off those features still help. That is why I posted, so some are aware… People have smart TV’s to use the internet. That is kind of the whole point of having them. Most people just don’t disconnect their TV from the Wi-Fi every time they are done streaming. Which, that would be a GOOD IDEA idea.

          • artyom@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 hours ago

            That is why I posted, so people are aware…

            You’re making them aware of the wrong things, as I just finished saying.

            People have smart TV’s to use the internet

            They can still use the internet without connecting their TV to it. You just plug another device into it.

            • Anonymous_Leaker@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              8 hours ago

              I know what a TV does, smart TV’s enables more features when it is online. SOME people just have a smart TV and that is it.

                • Anonymous_Leaker@lemmy.worldOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  8 hours ago

                  Yes they do! People for sure just have smart TV’s, and they have tons of apps when connected online. Load up Netflix and then they are done. Old people especially, do it all the time. That is all they use. That and probably just a phone. Shit, some still have landlines. They live alone and had somebody set it up for them.

    • LeapSecond@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 hours ago

      What features does a smart TV provide when not connected to the internet? (serious question, I’ve never had a smart TV)

      • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        They tend to be cheaper or have more features. The income from data harvesting subsidizes the price.

        Plus, in a lot of places you can’t get dumb TVs without them being commercial displays, which have different priorities. Businesses don’t really care about having 60hz, HDR, OLED, or low latency. Sometimes they don’t even care about having 4K resolution.

      • lost_faith@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        I’ll tell you what my 2 “smart” tvs do as they are not connected to the internet, they act as a slow to turn on display of my desktop. 27" monitor press power button, less than 10 seconds looking at desktop, 40" samsung smart tv 15-20+ seconds to see the desktop without a stupid overlay, 65" samsung 4k smart tv 30-45 seconds till desktop is fully visible.

        TL:DR NONE! Use as a monitor

      • artyom@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 hours ago

        None? The idea is not to get more features, it’s to take it offline so it can’t send data about you back home. Plug in another smart device into the TV and use that for streaming and such.

        • LeapSecond@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Dumb tvs are still sold in some places. If it’s impossible to get a dumb TV and have a pc, at that point it makes more sense to get a simple monitor and use the pc as the smart device so you actually have full control. The android boxes you connect to tvs are not the epitome of privacy either.

          • mrnngglry@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 hours ago

            This is true. Almost every streaming box sells your data out of the box. Roku is one of the worst. Nvidia Shield is pretty bad too.

          • artyom@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 hours ago

            “Dumb TVs” are extremely rare. You can buy most TVs and just not connect them to the internet and achieve the same thing.

            • LeapSecond@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 hour ago

              This feels like such a waste but if there really aren’t any dumb tvs around anymore, oh well

  • rayf@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I read that put those things on a separate guest WiFi is a good option for better security too ?

    • Anonymous_Leaker@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      True, it is more secure with a secondary guest network. But I doubt it stops data from being sent back in this case. A strong Wi-Fi password is always recommended too with a guest network.

  • AceFuzzLord@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I really hope there are wifi dummy boards that allow you to fake your device being connected despite not being able to connect to any network. Warranty be damned, I’d be more than willing to cut open a TV to either replace the board or just completely disconnect it.