• echo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    In this case they even had a completely different install of Windows. There is simply no way at all that the fingerprint should match. If it did match, then their implementation sucks. Fuck them if they made it that bad intentionally. Better to have to catch and ban the same person 10 times than ban an innocent person even once.

    • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      I can’t verify that each CPU has a unique id, the way a network card does (MAC address), but it might be a trade secret, who knows.

      As far as banning innocent people, if the math is that one cheater drives away 100 honest players, it’s better to ban up to 99 honest players to get to that 1 cheater.

      • frongt@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        A CPU serial number or other ID is more unique than a MAC address, as those can be spoofed, and are not guaranteed to be unique, either. I heard one case of someone tearing their hair out over a mystery network issue, eventually discovering two NICs with the same MAC. And also the case of someone buying a whole pallet of NICs, which turned out to all have the same MAC address.

        But I don’t think that math checks out. A player driven away might return, but a banned player can’t.