These math breakthroughs happened by throwing tens of thousands of agents at a problem to cover all possible angles (with tools developed by other mathematicians) costing the same amount of money as hiring ten top tier mathematicians for several years. Not saying it is not impressive, but not “AI can replace sciencetists” level impressive.
Just because AI is smarter than Sam Altman doesn’t mean it’s smarter than top scientists. Especially considering Sam is just about as smart as a pile of horseshit.
Sam, just because the digital parrot outsmarts you, it does not need to be intelligent.
Yawn. Wake me up when AI cures all cancers.
Is that sister fucking Sam Altman?
But apparently not smarter than CEOs or these con artists would all fuck off.
I don’t know, how is this any different than saying Wikipedia knows more than any human on earth? Ok, so you’re computer program has a bunch of information, who cares?
Now we flipped the house and senate, I hope we get some common sense guard rails for AI.
I belive it as soon as they replace Scam Altman with AI as CEO and report postive growth and income for at last the next 10 Years.
But CEO’s are much more smarterer than scientists!
If scientists are so smart, why don’t they have any money?
Don’t tell me they value something other than “number go up” because I won’t understand you.
AI spits out whatever it finds on the internet. I guess you could say that’s smart if you’re being obtuse about it…
I believe AI is smarter than Sam Altman.
Sam Altman believes he is smarter than scientists.
I asked AI if it’s smarter than scientists, and it said no. So if Sam says I should trust AI, Sam is full of shit.
The more pants-on-head crazy the claims are, the more desperate they are.
Yet I can ask it to do work that only a moderately smart human can do, like read, and it fucks that up so hard.
Is this how we find out Sam Altman is actually an illiterate dipshit?
If AI is so smart how come it can’t figure out how to run without a shit tonne of water and generating all that noise?
yo Sam…give one single example where any scientist can solve anything without new data generated by experimentation done in a lab by people.
The idea that a “super intelligence” will cure diseases is a an ignorant view of drug discovery. AI is being trained on mostly experimental failures and mostly poor experimental design in poor model systems for human disease. You can only polish a turd so hard.
They legitimately, genuinely, 100% believe the AI can simulate everything and will use the to intelligently iterate solutions. There is zero reasoning with these lunatics
Even if AI could do that, the text processor they built can’t
