Nat (she/they)

I thought the joke here was that your unbalanced parentheses would make me angry (they did))

We already have nanoservices, they’re called functions. If you want a function run on another box, that’s called RPC.

Sounds like a distributed monad

My gender is

{ toString: ()=>{String.prototype.toString = ()=>">:3"; return ":3";} }

And then the compiler updates to get better at spotting optimization opportunities and it blows up again

How convoluted was it?

Listening to employees when making decisions, what a concept! It’s a shame many places don’t do that.

Do you get two empty spaces next to your tower? For maintenance if the lower elements.

It’s called a tower PC for a reason

All human strings are finite…

If your government is controlled by neoliberal capitalists, that is what might happen yes, and that is why we should do as much as we can to get a government that actually acts in the interest of the people.

Government isn’t inherently bad at doing things, you’ve just been conditioned to think that by this system that forces the government to self-sabotage. Of course, the self-sabotage only applies to social programs, they’re actually very good and efficient at subsidizing and lowering taxes for the wealthy, for instance.

You’re thinking within the confines of the capitalist market, but why limit yourself? We can have systems where you can easily switch homes with people, or keep rent but keep it reasonable and without the huge extractive element, or so many other potential systems.

The problems you mention are problems created by capitalism, we have the power to fix them by playing by different rules, because the rules are made up.

I literally said the word in my reply. Also, you seem to have completely missed the point: we can have them charge rent, or provide it for free, or rent but subsidized, or any other scheme because it’s detached from market logic. It’s not about the word “landlord”, it’s about the effects of actions. Call it whatever you want, I don’t care.

And admin roles really don’t need a wage equivalent to mortgage payments and ownership of the properties they administer, so your comparison is dishonest. I’d prefer you spent your thinking on reason rather than formulating your troll response.

The capitalist system really limits the kinds of things people can imagine. We’re not confined to regulating the market from the outside, the government can be the “landlord” without the profit incentive.

Maybe there’s a signal handler or some other outside force that knows where that variable lives on the stack (maybe through DWARF) and can pause your program to modify it asynchronously. Very niche. More practical is purely to inhibit certain compiler optimizations.

It makes more sense if you think of const as “read-only”. Volatile just means the compiler can’t make the assumption that the compiler is the only thing that can modify the variable. A const volatile variable can return different results when read different times.

Can a EULA ban fair use? Google v Oracle might have something to say about this.

The whole world was counting on you, PizzaFacia, you let us all down!

Also, a lot of editors won’t unindent on backspace of spaces indentation, so I end up messing up the indentation with a 3/4 indent