Normies: “Stolen vehicle slow-down!? YES, please! It’s not like I could steal my own vehicle!”

hehe… you TOO can become a partner! We’re having a special! Anyone willing to pay for partnership access coincidentally gets an unrelated trove of personal data!

I guess AI is best measured by how much power it consumes… ?

Nah, just sort by date instead of topology, or vice versa.

git gud, son

I don’t know if it is the same brand, but my morning walks are cheered on by an increasing chorus/wave of “hello, you are currently being recorded”. Weird dystopian vibes.

I proudly accept their downvotes as their protest against the status-quo. In effect saying: “too real”. My last employer “asked” us to all install an app to access the office doors, and then mandated return-to-office, so I’m right there with you. :)

“None of my other subordinates had a problem with this, it’s a simple ask and only takes a minute.”

“Corporate needs you to install this app on your phone…”

How is this not satire?!

Of course, this is what it means to pass the turing test.

If you own all the land around the dead-end street, then I could see an argument to it effectively being your private driveway, and if you own the last property on the street (such that nobody needs access, including MAINTENANCE and TRAIL access), then I could see an argument that the road was made too long and you are reclaiming a bit of it. Otherwise, you are still storing your stuff on public property, just with fewer effected by your misdemeanor.

…or maybe one of those tiny-home trailers?

I remember there being tricks to get statistically more accurate math, like “show your work”, etc.

Wut?!?! Link please!

Frequencies.

Well, I do have MBSE on the brain, but the idea here is more like a low-code/no-code environment with an ABSOLUTELY ENORMOUS “pit of success”… so large that even GenAI can reliably fall into it. Numbered tabs, you go left to right answering questions and fiddling with with prompts, paint-by-numbers for working software.

I imagine that it is theoretically possible to successfully vibe-code, but probably not with a conventional project layout nor would it look much like traditional programming. Something like your interaction primarily being a “requirements list”, which gets translated into interfaces and heavy requirements tests against those interfaces, and each implementation file being disposable (regenerated) & super-self-contained, and only being able to “save” (or commit) implementations that pass the tests.

…and if you are building a webapp, it would not be able to touch the API layer except through operational transforms (which trigger new [major] version numbers]. Sorta like MCP.

Said another way, if we could make it more like a “ratchet” incrementing, and less like an out-of-control aircraft… then maybe?!?

How much you want to bet it includes (and requires) “AI interviews” to suck the last bit of dignity from you?

I guess “death panels” are fine if they are machines?