No? They’re turning onto the road from a right angle. The truck absolutely didn’t just drive around the “safety car”, if that’s what it is.

Yes to both.

You say this like it makes sense that this functionality isn’t the default. Why the fuck does that make sense to you?!

Ok, then don’t. Thanks for sharing.

We could go the other way as well: TI’s C2000 microcontroller architecture has no way to access a single byte, let alone a bit. A Boolean is stored in 16-bits on that one.

They’re just copying the description of the turbo encabulator.

*possiblyleon127

I don’t think you have a good handle on what mathematicians do.

This take is dumb af lol.

Pron

non tech person

Watched the first few seconds: non tech person buys a laptop with Linux instead of Windows without realizing, can’t install required software. Stupid story.

Shit like what? Someone else’s opinion?

I just bought a new car and it has internet enabled remote start. The salesman touted the feature. My response: “oh so I can start the car in [one state] while I’m in [another state] so it’s ready for me when I get back?” He didn’t have a good response for that. Nice car, dumbass feature.

I would say I would boycott Starbucks, but that would imply they have a product I desire.

I use xournal++ for notes and math stuff. Have looked at rnote as well but haven’t really dove in and tried it thoroughly.

I forgot Moses was in Tron

Except the possibility to keep the current price is no longer available, therefore, the consumer does not have the option to continue paying the same price, ergo TMobile forced the customer to change the price they pay, either to a higher amount for the same contact or to 0 for no contact. The original advertisement stated that TMobile would never change the price a customer pays, but it directly forcing this change by not offering the same contact.

Take a minute and rethink this comment.

I did read this.