- 108 Posts
- 41 Comments
tfm@europe.pubto Technology@lemmy.world•Things at Tesla are worse than they appearEnglish1·4 days agoElon claims Tesla is already past that point.
Elon claims a lot of shit. Most of them are lies. He cannot prove with real data that “FSD” really crashes less.
Even if you’re skeptical of the claim, it’s clearly close enough to be concerned about.
Again, Teslas aren’t even considered autonomous cars.
Don’t get me wrong, I want to be optimistic. But currently it looks like this will take much longer to succeed than Elon and other hype men claimed.
tfm@europe.pubto Privacy@lemmy.ml•Why does Signal want a phone number to register if it's supposedly privacy first?413·4 days agoPrivacy ≠ Anonymity ≠ Security
tfm@europe.pubto Technology@lemmy.world•Things at Tesla are worse than they appearEnglish2·4 days agoWe will soon be at the point, or already are, that your choice kills more people.
Where do you get that? From Elon?
Yes safety features and driving assistants make driving safer. Letting the car drive by itself not (especially with Teslas).
tfm@europe.pubto Technology@lemmy.world•Things at Tesla are worse than they appearEnglish2·5 days agoThis stuff is highly regulated https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regulation_of_self-driving_cars
Mercedes has the first autonomous car (L3) you can buy, which you can only activate at low speeds on certain roads in Germany. It’s only possible because of Lidar sensors and when activated you are legally allowed to look at your phone as long as you can take over in 10 or so seconds.
You aren’t allowed to do this in a Tesla, since the government doesn’t categorize Teslas as autonomous vehicles which requires L3+.
No car manufacturer can sell real autonomous vehicles without government approval. Tesla FSD is just Marketing bs. Others are far ahead in terms of autonomous driving tech.
tfm@europe.pubto Technology@lemmy.world•Things at Tesla are worse than they appearEnglish1·5 days agoThe thing is humans are horrible drivers, costing a huge toll in lives and property every year.
True
We may already be at the point where we need to deal with the ethics of inadequate self-driving causing too many accidents vs human causing more.
Are you talking about waymo vs human driver? It’s currently (and maybe never) economical to roll that out globally. That would cost trillions and probably wouldn’t even be feasible everywhere.
Teslas aren’t autonomous but just mere driving assistants so you can’t compare them. Otherwise you’d also have to include the Mercedeses (which btw have the first commercial Level 3 car), BMWs, BYDs, …
but is it ethical to block Immature technology if it does overall save lives?
It would be very unethical to allow companies to profit from dangerous and unsafe technology that kills people.
tfm@europe.pubto Technology@lemmy.world•Things at Tesla are worse than they appearEnglish1·5 days agoPresumably we have the intelligence to set requirements before something can be called self-driving
We already have that https://www.sae.org/blog/sae-j3016-update
tfm@europe.pubOPto Fuck AI@lemmy.world•AI hallucinations are getting worse – and they're here to stay3·5 days agoNot pay but sign up wall. But I get it. It’s annoying af.
tfm@europe.pubto Technology@lemmy.world•Things at Tesla are worse than they appearEnglish3·5 days agoYeah sure. If you want the same bad results as humans deliver, in terms of crash rates, than it’s possible. I wouldn’t trust it. Also human vision and processing is completely different from computer vision and processing.
tfm@europe.pubto Technology@lemmy.world•Things at Tesla are worse than they appearEnglish1·5 days agoI get what you mean but it’s still stuck at level 2 and it always will be. No matter how good it is, if you move your eyes from the road, it will eventually kill you. Cameras alone are not sufficient enough for autonomous driving.
tfm@europe.pubto Not The Onion@lemmy.world•DOGE software engineer’s computer infected by info-stealing malwareEnglish1·6 days agoThe weird ones
tfm@europe.pubto Technology@lemmy.world•Things at Tesla are worse than they appearEnglish6·6 days agorobotaxis
It’s going to be a disaster. Tesla “FSD” is glorified cruise control on level 2 on the autonomous driving scale.
semi
It’s already a disaster. The economics don’t add up and the few on the road break down all the time.
tfm@europe.pubto Not The Onion@lemmy.world•DOGE software engineer’s computer infected by info-stealing malwareEnglish102·6 days agoPorn sites
tfm@europe.pubOPto Not The Onion@lemmy.world•JD Vance jokes about detaining World Cup visitorsEnglish2·8 days ago🤑🤑🤑
Controversial take
Meta still collects all the meta data it gets it’s hands on. Also WhatsApp is completely closed source and proprietary. You will never know if they properly encrypt your stuff and if the private keys really never leave your device. You still have to trust Zuckerberg that he properly protects your data … from him.
Only EE. The CE is FOSS https://github.com/toeverything/AFFiNE/blob/canary/packages/backend/server/LICENSE
tfm@europe.pubto Fediverse@lemmy.ml•Serious Question - Is the ActivityPub deletion problem a fatal flaw?9·1 month agoYes, it should be explicitly mentioned, that deletion isn’t guaranteed. But I don’t think it’s a deal breaker. People should be aware that posting something publicly on the internet, must always be considered to be preserved into infinity.
If you post something publicly on Facebook, there is also a high probability that some web scrapers save your pictures and posts. Deletion does nothing there.
Btw ATproto is even worse. Pretty much everything is public there. https://docs.bsky.app/blog/block-implementation
Schrödingers Boolean