based

You should be able to visit the post via a web browser that’s not signed in and get a direct URL. Also just don’t link to IG when possible (I know you probably have your reasons but throwing that out there).

XD

brother why

wokémon

I might be too late to this post but what do you think about making a community, something like !exposingLLMs or !LLMexperiments, for stuff like this?

I personally come to the internet to engage with people, not AIs so much. I understand that this is important investigation that needs to be done. But it’s kind of all over my feed right now. I would much prefer this research be done by field pros, and then I can read the results in a published article or blog post.

Basically, I’m just saying I am not really a fan of [LLM name] [can/cant’t] [thing] <screenshot of output>. Again I do think it’s important research to be done, but if it could be kept to some communities one could choose to block the entire category—as well as encourage collaborative investigations within the topic.

waow lowkey based

this has gotta be like astroturfing or something are we really citing LLM content in year of our lord 2025 ?? like gorl

two things can be true:

1 musk IS a nazi

2 LLMs are majorly sucky and trained with old data. the one OP is citing in particular doesn’t even know what year it is 🗿

what are we doing here? stop outsourcing common sense to ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE of all things. we are cooked. 😭

LETS GOOOOOOO

if i had the ability i wouldn’t have made this post lol

Yes and it should be worse. OpenAI should be forced to take on the cost of compensating every copyright holder it exploited. If that means OpenAI doesn’t exist I’m absolutely okay with that.

please give me the lobbing machine 🙏

right?!? lol

i know mbfc isnt the best but: https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/sludge/

Bias Rating: LEFT Factual Reporting: HIGH Country: USA MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE Media Type: Website Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY

…so…. maybe? maybe its fine idk

“lobbing”

is this a trusted outlet? at least we can be pretty sure a human wrote it ha ha ha

probably boosts user performance for users who have more experience like you but slightly hinders new users who haven’t got the hang of it yet

if steam prioritizing retention of growing userbase is one of its goals, it’s not a bad strategy in my opinion

i know im silly for this but this is part of steam’s charm for me. i like that it just feels genuine like steam isn’t trying to lull you with all the tried and true marketing and UI best practices. it feels very practical, like using old windows 9X UIs.

more than half of visitors leave a page if they’re forced to wait longer than 3 seconds

and it’s not outlandish to suggest that length decreases every year.

Agree to all, but just to add clarity, there is existing Mandarin LGBT content that was posted prior to the US influx. If there is moderation of queer voices going on, it’s a a similar level to what we are already familiar with from Meta and TikTok, not significantly more.

I sacrificed my soul to go over and check it out, immediately followed a bunch of LGBT creators of both US and Chinese locale. Nothing I followed or liked seems to have been removed yet, so just giving my two honest cents on that. The stuff that gets removed appears to be mainly Chinese politics and that’s it.

Is it the perfect protest solution? Naw.

Is it better than Musk and Zuckerberg getting a shit ton of free revenue from their corruption? Yea.

Is it funny as fuck? YUPP LMAO

i agree (and this comment here)